home · Motivation · Budget analysis. Plan-actual analysis of budget execution of income and expenses

Budget analysis. Plan-actual analysis of budget execution of income and expenses

Budgeting is one of the most important elements of management accounting, the main tasks of which are drawing up preliminary budgets, promptly identifying deviations, factor analysis of the results obtained and searching for optimal options for management decisions.

Analysis of the company's budget execution is a comparison of actual results with planned ones and identifying the causes of deviations in natural, absolute and relative values.

A company that wants to succeed in competition, especially in conditions of economic instability, should pay special attention to the analysis of budget execution, as this makes it possible to reveal many problems in management, strengthen control over costs, and identify those responsible for performance results.

Budget analysis includes three stages:

Preliminary stage. The analysis is carried out at the stage of budget formation in order to substantiate the data.

Current (interim) stage. The analysis is carried out at the stage of budget execution. A set of preventive measures to identify unreasonable expenses and deviations. Making decisions about the need to adjust the budget or tighten control over budget execution.

The final stage. Analysis of deviations and the reasons for their occurrence is carried out based on the results of the period. Development of measures to minimize the impact of negative factors and consolidate positive ones in the future. Formation of conclusions and recommendations for the next planning period

Figure 1. Analysis of deviations using the example of the software product “WA: Financier”.

Deviation analysis, aimed at developing management decisions and tactics, involves a detailed analysis that reflects the determination of the degree of influence of various factors on performance indicators. The methodology for conducting factor analysis is as follows:

  • The general deviation of the final indicator from the planned one is determined;
  • A direct relationship is formed between the factors and the final indicator;
  • The relationship between factors and outcome indicators is modeled;
  • Factors are ranked by degree of influence;
  • The role of each of them in changing the final indicator is analyzed and assessed.
  • Conclusions and recommendations are formulated regarding management decisions aimed at executing or adjusting the budget.

Deviation analysis at all stages should take into account both the current and strategic plans of the company. Plan fact analysis of budget execution of income and expenses can be carried out, for example, both for the company as a whole and for individual structural divisions, regions, and projects.


Figure 2. Analysis of deviations using the example of the software product “WA: Financier”.

Plan-actual analysis of the budget using the example of the WA system: The financier allows you to assess deviations in absolute and relative terms by comparing the indicators planned in the budgets with the actual results in any analytical sections.

Thus, budget analysis helps identify problems, highlights existing opportunities, facilitates decision making and coordination of activities between departments of the company.

The budgeting process should be accompanied by feedback. The processes of budget control and analysis act as feedback. Budget control includes the following operations:

  • budget execution control;
  • identifying deviations by item;
  • analysis of the reasons that caused deviations;
  • development of measures to optimize budget implementation;
  • making necessary management decisions.

Let's look at the key points that a budget controller should take into account when working with the budget.

DEVIATIONS

Control of simple and complex budgets begins with the calculation of deviations (Table 1). Deviations always occur, since the budget is a set of planned indicators. At this stage count on:

  • absolute deviations. The absolute deviation is understood as the difference between the actual and planned value with the corresponding sign according to the rules of formal mathematics (columns 7, 10 of Table 1);
  • relative deviations(columns 8, 11 of Table 1). Such deviations are more informative and are expressed as a percentage of the analyzed value. Absolute and relative deviations complement each other;
  • cumulative deviations. In this case, the difference between the cumulative indicators is found. The cumulative indicator is an amount calculated on an accrual basis.

Cumulative deviation allows you to assess the degree of plan fulfillment for a quarter, half a year and the possible difference by the end of the budget period (year).

Random fluctuations in budget indicators that occur in certain periods can lead to significant deviations in a short period of time, and during the budget year the fluctuations can be insignificant. Cumulation allows you to compensate for random deviations and more accurately identify the trend;

  • selective deviations. The calculation of these deviations involves comparing the values ​​of a certain time interval. It is assumed that the controlled values ​​will be compared over time: quarter, month or day.

Comparison of controllable values ​​for a certain month of the current year with the same month of the previous year (for example, the item “Marketing expenses” in January 2016 and in January 2015) can be more informative comparison with the previous month of the planning period under consideration.

The method of calculating selective deviations is used to identify and control the reasons for changes in budget indicators, characterized by a seasonal factor. Sometimes, to calculate selective deviations, they take not the last year, but another base period (for example, the first year when budgeting was carried out, the pre-crisis or post-crisis period).

In Table 1, selective deviations are reflected in columns 10 and 11. They show that compared to the fourth quarter. 2014 in the reporting quarter, the budget for material costs for equipment repairs increased by 121 thousand. rub. (14.09%). At the same time, the amount of costs by budget item differs significantly. For example, for electrodes we see a reduction in costs by 800 rubles. (6.67%), for hardware - an increase in costs by 700 rubles. (25%).

NOTE

Control calculations of deviations do not save you from overexpenditures and budget distortions, but they allow you to make management decisions to level out overexpenditures in the future.

It is best to request a detailed description of the reasons and directions of deviations from the heads of departments responsible for budget items.

Table 1. Control of the budget of material costs for equipment repairs in the raw material preparation workshop of Proizvodstvo LLC

No.

Budget item

Reporting period—IV sq. 2015

Plan-actual deviation according toIVsq. 2015

IVsq. 2014 — fact, rub.

Deviation (factIVsq. 2014 and factIVsq. 2015)

plan, rub.

fact, rub.

specific gravity - plan

specific gravity is a fact

rub. (+/-)

rub. (+/-)

Electrodes

Ball valves

Oxygen

Thermal insulation

Bearings

Rubber cuffs

Total

950 000,00

980 000,00

30 000,00

859 000,00

121 000,00

WE ASSESS DEVIATIONS

Let’s assume that plan-actual calculations have been made for the budget (more than 200 items) and deviations have been identified. In this situation, there is no need to blame economists for an illiterate budget or department employees for the incorrectness of the data provided. It is important to approach the issue of assessment and analysis of deviations correctly.

When working with deviations, the question often arises: “Is it necessary to conduct an assessment and control analysis of absolutely all identified deviations?” Experienced financial specialists will answer this question negatively and will work in the following areas:

1. Assessment and analysis of deviations that have exceeded a certain limit.

The limit must be approved by the general director. Limits are set in absolute values ​​or percentages. It is recommended to set limits depending on the amount being analyzed (the planned value of the indicator) (Table 2).

Table 2. Limits depending on the planned value of the indicator

No.

Planned value of the indicator (analyzed amount)

Permissible percentage of deviations, %

Up to 10 thousand rubles.

From 10 thousand rubles. up to 100 thousand rubles.

From 100 thousand rubles. up to 1000 thousand rubles.

From 1000 thousand rubles. and higher

Sometimes, for savings, a wider limit is set (for example, for the gradation indicated in Table 2: 20, 10, 5 and 2%, respectively), and for overspending on an item - within a more stringent framework.

EXAMPLE 1

Under the item “Payment of warehouse personnel” in the second half of 2015, 800 thousand rubles were planned, the actual amount was 860 thousand rubles. Deviation - 60 thousand rubles, or 7,5 % . Guided by the third limit according to table. 2, it can be understood that the deviation exceeds the established limit. This means that it is necessary to determine the factors that caused this deviation.

EXAMPLE 2

9,500 rubles were planned to provide employees with drinking water, but 10,300 rubles were actually spent. Deviation - 800 rub. ( 8,4 % ), which fits into the first limit (see Table 2). Further elaboration of this figure is not necessary.

If we turn to the example of LLC “Proizvodstvo”, then the budget items “Ball valves” and “Oxygen” according to table. 2 fits into the limit. Deviations for them do not exceed 10%; they do not require thorough study.

2. Working with deviations, the value of which is significant compared to the final budget amount.

Let’s assume that the budget for the purchase of basic materials is 1020 thousand rubles, the deviation for the item “Metal” is 147 thousand rubles, or 14.4% of the total budget. This is a big number, you need to find the reasons for this deviation (increase in prices from suppliers, incorrect technological standards, etc.).

It is advisable to pre-approve the percentage of deviations (Table 3).

The budget for material costs for repairs for Production LLC contains 88 items (see Table 1), the permissible percentage of deviations compared to the total amount is 5%.

The biggest savings in the amount of 160 thousand rubles. observed under the article “Bearings”, which amounts to 16,84 % (160 thousand rubles / 950 thousand rubles × 100%), that is, it significantly exceeds the permissible amount and requires clarification of the situation.

Another significant deviation is an overexpenditure of 19 thousand rubles. (76%) under the article “Rubber cuffs” - fits into the 5% limit (19 thousand rubles / 950 thousand rubles × 100% = 2%). From the point of view of weight for the final indicator, this is not so significant, but this article cannot be set aside without analysis, since overspending 76 % does not fit into the limit established in the table. 2.

3. Expert assessment of deviations.

The method does not require complex calculations; deviation limits are set based on expert opinion. The experts are the heads of departments responsible for a particular operating budget. The accuracy of the deviation limits determined in this way is quite low and subjective.

Expert assessment method it is advisable to use in companies that produce single or small-scale products, implement new projects, conduct research and development work, as well as in construction companies. This assessment method is in demand in cases where there is no data for previous periods.

NOTE

Department heads are interested in ensuring that the deviation limits approved by the company are as wide as possible. This will allow officials to relieve themselves of responsibility for failure to fulfill their plans and tasks.

A situation where the accepted limits of deviations are extremely narrow has a weak control function. As a result, when carrying out a plan-fact analysis, most of the budget items will go off scale in terms of deviations and require management decisions, although in fact only for a few of them the deviations will be truly significant. It is clear that the labor costs of experienced economists, experts and managers will be wasted.

Working with deviations aimed at subsequent management decisions requires a more detailed factor analysis the influence of various parameters on key indicators (profit, cash flow, etc.).

Technology carrying out such control looks like this:

1. Identification of factors that influence the value of the final indicator.

2. Determination of the total deviation of the final indicator from the planned budget value.

3. Determination of the deviation of the final indicator as a result of the deviation of each individual factor.

4. Determining the priorities of the influence of individual factors on the value of the final indicator.

REPORTING OF DEVIATIONS

Deviation reporting is a core element of the control system. For certain indicators (for example, receipt of sales revenue) reporting is generated daily, for others - weekly and monthly. It all depends on the nature of the controlled indicators.

Data on deviations are presented to management in the form of notices or reports. Deviation reports must be visual. When compiling a report, you can highlight in color indicators that have a significant deviation from the plan. The choice of color should be determined by the magnitude of the deviations: positive deviations are highlighted in green, negative ones in red, and values ​​close to the limits are highlighted in orange. Values ​​within normal limits are not highlighted.

Coloring will allow the manager to quickly assess the current situation in the company and focus on indicators that have negative trends .

Another option for preparing a report is “speedometer” type diagrams with sectors “Normal”, “Below”, “Above”, where the position of the virtual arrow indicates the status of the indicator. Such charts are common in sales: sales managers display them on the monitor screen and track indicators in real time.

It would be advisable to develop deviation control regulations. The regulations must contain:

  • description of the methodology for monitoring deviations. Such a methodology should be transparent and understandable not only for the PEO, but also for other departments (production, sales);
  • a form of notification (report) of deviations, which is more visual and effective than making notes in standard reports. It is possible to develop systems of “speedometers” and “traffic lights” for key indicators. An example of a “traffic light” for accounts payable and receivable: a payment delay of three days is highlighted in orange, more than ten days - in red;
  • deadlines and procedure for submitting reports;
  • feedback procedure (additional analytical information from an economist may be required);
  • identification of officials responsible for making decisions;
  • deadlines for making decisions on identified deviations.

NOTE

Managing and dealing with variances is part of the management and budget process. Deviations of actual results from planned ones become the subject of operational or strategic meetings (at the level of middle managers and at the level of top management, respectively). During the meetings, the activities of the enterprise are analyzed in detail and all the factors that caused the greatest deviations, and the necessary management decisions are developed.

IS THE PLAN REALISTIC?

Budget execution control is not always carried out by the employees who compiled it. There are situations when serious deviations force the specialists who adopted the budget to double-check the validity of the planned values.

Unrealism, errors or the desire to embellish in practice look like this:

1. The CEO and owners of the company want to see profits grow by 25%. For objective reasons (market decline, fierce competition, high costs), the company can give 15% under constant conditions. Heads of departments enter numbers, which will suit top managers and owners, while they were required to develop a set of measures to increase sales and reduce costs.

2. The sales budget is not based on market forecasts, but is justified by the commissioning of new equipment. It happens that the situation gets worse when the investment budget has not yet been drawn up or, due to lack of funds, they decided to abandon the investment program, but at the same time the sales budget was not adjusted.

3. The budget was formed based on last year's figures, adjusted for the inflation index and growth rate. Wherein did not take into account essential conditions that occurred during the current year (staffing, cost structure, contractual terms of working with clients have changed).

4. You may encounter a situation where it is not possible to double-check the calculations and the validity of the figures included in the budget. There were calculations, but they disappeared somewhere. Nobody remembers why this particular figure was entered or why adjustments were made. In this case, there is no need to talk about the correctness of the planned value; it is not possible to control deviations.

For this kind of problematic items, there is only one direction of control left - to check whether there was really a need for expenses. If these are materials, they check their availability in the warehouse, in the workshop, and control their reflection in the cost of production.

To prevent such situations from arising, employees responsible for generating figures in the budget must ensure not only the availability of documents and calculations confirming the provision of data to the budget, but also prompt access to them by monitoring specialists.

Budget controller should check following:

  • budget forms are filled out completely, with the required level of detail;
  • All necessary explanations, forecasts, transcripts, and calculations are attached to the income and expense items.

The plan must be signed by all officials responsible for its preparation and approval.

The condition ensuring the possibility of such control: presence of budget regulations in the company,budgeting regulations, where all planned parameters are clearly recorded.

5. Companies that have a branch structure may face a situation where the head office enters into a service agreement for all territorial divisions and each branch enters into a similar agreement with a regional supplier. As a result, costs will double. For geographically distributed companies, monitoring for such “duplications” is important.

6. The budget controller needs to make sure that the figures presented in the budget comply with approved standards (for example, standards for the consumption of raw materials, fuels and lubricants). He must check whether employees have exceeded the mobile communication limit. It is important to know who developed and approved the norms and when, what internal and external factors were involved, how long ago the norms were revised.

OPERATIONAL CONTROL DURING BUDGET EXECUTION

If financial specialists adopted the budget, for example, on January 10, and six months later decided to carry out control, then many deviations will immediately become apparent. To avoid such a situation, you need to organize proper daily control of budget execution.

At the stage of implementing budgeting systems, the process of budgeting and the process of accumulating actual data should be regulated. Actual data is always in the management information system, but each amount of expense/income is important to identify with the budget item. When reflecting business transactions, it is necessary to indicate not only the mandatory legislative details, but also the budget item to which this or that primary document relates. Each actual operation must contain an additional feature - budget item number.

The budget item is indicated on the document by its originator/recipient, and the item must be confirmed by the PEO economist.

The figure shows a mechanism for monitoring requests for payment, the costs of which are planned by the budget.

The interaction diagram presented in the figure allows you to operational cost control, and also avoid a situation where actual expenses are adjusted to budget items. An example of such adjustment: when concluding contracts and paying bills that are not provided for in the budget, the head of the department presents these expenses as planned, indicating the numbers of the items for which funding is planned or has not yet been exhausted. Accounting, when distributing such expenses, pays attention only to the legality of the transaction, but not to the economic meaning, blindly entering the items indicated by the head of the department.

The situation described in the example occurs if the enterprise does not have a PEO or its employees are busy with another area of ​​work (not budget control). This happens when “treasurers” accept applications and documents for payment without a PEO visa, ignoring economists as specialists in the field of control. In this case, no variance analysis will provide adequate control.

IT IS IMPORTANT

It is necessary to prohibit employees of the treasury (financial department) from accepting bills as payment if they do not have a PEO employee visa and the classification of expenses (numbers, codes of budget items) is not indicated. At the same time, PEO employees need to be ensured independence; they should not be subject to pressure from department directors and department heads.

CONTRACT CONTROL

The financial department or PEO must participate in the contract approval procedure. Imagine the situation. The head of the supply department signed an agreement for the supply of spare parts in the amount of 400 thousand rubles, although such expenses are not provided for in the budget, submitted an order to the supplier (settlement procedure - prepayment) or, even worse, has already received spare parts, signed an invoice (settlement procedure - deferment) . As a result, the financial department is faced with a fact: pay or put the company at risk of penalties. That's one problem. The second problem: if such an agreement is paid, a cash shortage may arise and the financial department will not pay an important payment that was budgeted and properly planned.

Such emergency and risky situations can be avoided if the procedure for concluding and signing contracts is strictly regulated. Must act rule: The general director does not endorse the contract if there is no budget control in the contract approval sheet.

What should be the budgetary control of contracts? We do not take into account the usual approval committee (legal adviser, accountant, etc.). The approval sheet must indicate:

  • subject of the contract (direction of expenses and a brief description of what exactly is planned to be purchased);
  • code and name of the budget item (put down by the employee of the financial department or PEO who controls the budget);
  • the balance of the limit for the item at the time of approval of the contract, taking into account upcoming payments under the contract;
  • signature and full name of the official who entered the budget classification and the balance of the limit.

It is difficult to control the expenditure of funds by monitoring contracts. The difficulty lies in the fact that often framework agreements are signed, and specific quantities of supplies are then agreed upon by the parties in applications and specifications, of which there may be two or twenty-two. The solution is to insist on concluding contracts with a clearly fixed amount. However, there is a possibility that an additional agreement to the contract will be concluded and the amount will increase. Therefore, it is necessary to apply other controls: all documents that change the text of the signed and agreed upon agreement (additional agreements, appendices, specifications) undergo a similar approval procedure.

It is difficult to perform budgetary control of contracts that last longer than a calendar year. Therefore, it is necessary to insist that the duration of the contract be calendar year, and configure the contract accounting program in such a way that it allows you to control budget amounts.

STRATEGIC CONTROL

Budget controllers, in addition to the usual plan-factual and executive control, must also carry out strategic control.

FOR YOUR INFORMATION

Monitoring the budget for compliance with the strategy must be carried out both at the stage of budget planning and during budget execution and actual expenses/income.

PEO economists must be empowered not accepted for approval from structural divisions budgets that do not correspond to the strategic goals of the company.

EXAMPLE 3

In the context of the crisis and falling sales, Company A adopted a strategy for the budget year to reduce expenses by 30%. At the same time, the sales department plans to update office furniture in its budget. In this case, the head of the PEO should have the right not to sign the budget and return it to the sales department to exclude the specified item.

EXAMPLE 4

Company “B” has adopted a strategy to increase sales volume, but neither the sales department nor the personnel department plans expenses for recruiting new “salesmen” or for training both existing and new employees in the field of active sales. No extensive promotional activities are planned. This situation is a signal not only to return the specified budget to its compiler, but also to report to the general director (owners) about ignoring strategic plans by individual structural divisions.

The examples given concerned the control of strategic goals during budget planning. Let's consider an example of strategic control of the budget during its actual execution.

EXAMPLE 5

Company “C” planned to build a new electrical substation in 2015, which would save more than a million rubles a year. The company's strategy is to reduce the cost of finished products by 10%. Due to financial difficulties at the beginning of the year, expenditures on almost all budget items were reduced. Delaying the construction of the substation and its commissioning would mean unnecessary energy costs for the enterprise, which can be avoided. PEO economists replanned the budget so that the cost items associated with the construction of a strategic facility were fully financed. Less "strategic" articles were trimmed. As a result, at the end of the year the company received its first savings in electricity costs.

CONTROL OF TRANSFERS BETWEEN ARTICLES

Heads of structural divisions often insist on transferring planned expenses from one item to another, arguing that there is a reserve in their budget.

NOTE

If transfers between budget items become common practice, then it will be problematic to see the real state of affairs and carry out proper control.

In the face of rapidly changing market conditions, the company's Budget Committee must be flexible in its spending. In the process of budget execution acceptable, and sometimes necessary transfer funding between items. There should be strict regulations in this regard. It is necessary to identify items for which it is unacceptable to make transfers, and items for which the planned funds, if necessary, can be directed to more pressing goals. The important thing to remember here is strategic control. It is necessary to maintain an Adjustment Log - a single document in which the dates of the decision to transfer, responsible persons, reasons, article numbers and amounts from where funds were redirected must be recorded. .

ACCOUNTING SYSTEM CONTROL

When working with a budget, you must remember that this is a confidential document containing trade secrets. For example, the head of the business department does not need to know how much is planned for the purchase of the director’s chair, not to mention such data as sales volume and profit.

Basic requirements for accounting systems used in budgeting:

  • protection against unauthorized access;
  • protection against system errors;
  • ensuring the reliability of data, both planned and actual;
  • providing the necessary analytics (the ability to draw up a plan and fact, conduct various types of analysis, sort data);
  • a unified base of business transactions for accounting, tax and management accounting, that is, one-time data entry. The less data is exported and imported from one system to another (so-called transfers), the less likely there are errors, data inconsistencies, and duplicates, and the more transparent the system operates.

CONTROL THROUGH MOTIVATION

It is impossible to ensure constant control of budget processes only through control measures. The completeness of budget execution control will be ensured by motivating employees to achieve planned targets.

Requirements for the motivation system:

1. The motivation system must be clear so that specialists responsible for fulfilling the planned amounts for budget items can independently determine the amount of their wages for achieving the plan indicators.

2. The motivation system must be implemented simultaneously with the planning process. Planning officials should be motivated to develop budgets that are as close to reality as possible, rather than being guided by the principle that “paper will do.”

3. The bonus system should not encourage employees to deliberately underestimate targets in order to then exceed them and receive increased remuneration.

4. Every employee of the company needs to be interested in increasing efficiency. For example, it is impossible to imagine fulfilling the sales budget when sales managers are actively attracting customers, developing programs that stimulate sales, while the finished goods warehouse and the company’s delivery service are slowing down work, do not ensure timely shipment of products to customers, and make mistakes in the nomenclature of shipped goods. . Clients will not work with such a company, they will easily find a replacement for it, and the sales budget will not be met.

The budget controller must double-check whether the employee motivation system meets the specified requirements.

BUDGET QUALITY CONTROL

It is important to control the quality of planned income and expenses. Control involves a detailed analysis of each budget item, verification of calculations and justifications provided by structural units.

The PEO economist, who controls the quality of planning, must put himself in the place of the head of the corresponding department and plan the expenses of such a department from scratch, using logic, which can be seen in the calculations and explanations of the head. The controller needs to ensure that all factors and conditions are taken into account. This is a large amount of information and work in general, but such control will help identify system errors.

1. Argue and defend your own positions.

2. Even a highly qualified specialist will not be able to control absolutely all budget items in a quality manner, so first of all, pay attention to the most significant items of income and expenses, strategic items.

3. An economist responsible for budget control functions should never trust the “word of honor” of department employees; it is important to be guided by the rule “Trust, but verify.”

Conclusions:

  1. Most company budgets are prepared for various periods (month, quarter, year). At this frequency, it is necessary to monitor their implementation.
  2. Effective management is based on a system for planning the company's activities and monitoring the execution of developed budgets. The main control tool is to identify deviations of actually achieved indicators from planned ones.

Most analysts working in corporations must use various types of mathematical operations in Excel to obtain the company's operating indicators. Calculations such as percentages of the amount, relative deviation from the budget or possible markups arising from the completion of all business analyzes. All this must be calculated as a percentage.

How to calculate percentage of a number in Excel

When management asks you to calculate the percentage of current achievement of a goal, it means a relative comparison of current indicators with the planned indicators that need to be achieved. The math to calculate this formula in Excel is very simple. It is necessary to divide the current indicators by the planned ones and display the result value in the percentage format of the cells. Thus, we will obtain a percentage value reflecting the share of implementation of part of the plan. Let’s say in the company’s sales plan it is planned to sell 100 tablets this month, but the month has not yet ended and at the moment only 80 units have been sold. As a percentage, this is mathematically calculated as (80/100)*100. If we use the percentage format of cells in Excel, then we do not need to multiply by 100. In this case, the formula looks like this: =80/100.



How to calculate the percentage of plan completion in Excel

It doesn’t matter how the task is set: the percentage of achieving the goal, fulfilling the budget or sales plan as a percentage - it all relates to the same task. Calculated in the same way. The figure below shows a list of regions. On the contrary, for each region, the desired goal and the actual implementation of the plan are indicated next to it in a column. Please note that in the last column where the result of the plan is indicated in percentage, the cell format has been changed to “percentage”. And the formulas in this column are very simple - the value of the “Sold” column is divided by the value in the “Plan” column = C2/B2.

Not much can be said about this formula. After all, it is based on mathematical calculation. In the formula itself, only cell references are used, so that one value is divided by another. Without any functions. You just need to enter the formula in the first empty cell of the last column (D2), and then copy it by filling in the remaining cells.

How to calculate the percentage of completion of the overall plan

Now let's complicate the task. Let's say we need to separately compare each actual indicator in relation to the overall set plan for all regions. The task is clearly illustrated in the figure below:

This time, regions do not have a column with their own plan. Instead, the "Share" column immediately follows, where each sales figure is compared with the overall plan specified in cell E2. The formula in the Share column this time is =B2/$E$2.

Notice that the denominator of the formula uses an absolute reference to cell $E$2. The dollar signs tell us that the cell reference to the overall plan value is locked. Thanks to this, it does not change when the formula is copied to other cells in the “Share” column. In cell C6 we add up all the percentages to make sure the result is accurate. As we see again in the second figure, we received the same overfulfillment of the general plan - 105%. Our final percentage values ​​coincided, which means that all calculations of the formulas are correct.

What formula is needed?

%plan = (actual / plan) * 100%.

These indicators can be expressed both in quantitative and cost units, and also consist of several components.

Now let's look at the principle calculating plan implementation in Excel.

For example, we have data on planned and actual product output for the 1st quarter.

To do this, just do the following:

1) In the cell with the result, write a formula of the form:

For example: in cell C7 - plan, in cell D7 - fact. The formula in cell E7 looks like this:

In the cell's context menu, select "Cell Format" and set the necessary parameters.

After this, the cell will contain information about the implementation of the plan as a percentage.

Another problem may arise - you need calculate the forecast percentage of plan completion.

For example, in 10 days of March, 400 units of product were produced. You need to find out what percentage of the plan will be at the end of the month if the production rate remains the same.

To do this we use the formula:

%plan_forecast = (actual / current day) (plan / number of days in the month) * 100%.

This is what this formula looks like in Excel:

If you need to take exactly the current day, then we write the following formula:

Yes, as simple as two fingers on the asphalt.

Take the value “Plan9” in one cell, and the value “Fact9” in the other.

In the third, write a formula like "=Fact/Plan*1009 and set the format for percentage display of the result in it. If you have the automatic recalculation mode turned off (and it is turned on by default), then press the F9 key. As a result, the percentage of completion will be shown in the third cell your plan. Something like this!

First, you need to find the cell in which the plan is written, for example A10, and then find the cells that reflect current indicators or simply the status of execution on a certain date, for example H100.

The formula for calculating the percentage of plan completion will be the quotient of division:

=H100/A10(if the cell format is percentage)

=H100/A10*100(if the cell format is numeric)

Econcoverage New economy

Let's calculate the percentage of plan completion using the following formula:

Plan completion = 100% (16)

I quarter Issue. = 100% = 110.2%

II quarter Issue. = 100% = 102.8%

III quarter Issue. = 100% = 95.9%

IV quarter Issue. = 100% = 144.9%

Let's calculate the plan deviation using the following formula:

Deviation from plan = Actual - Plan (17)

I quarter Issue. = 21000 - 19050 = 1950 thousand rubles.

II quarter Issue. = 21600 - 21000 = 600 thousand rubles.

III quarter Issue. = 20000 - 20850 = -850 thousand rubles.

IV quarter Issue. = 30,000 - 20,700 = 9,300 thousand rubles.

From the above graph we can conclude that in the first and fourth quarters at the Kolorit PC during 2010, the balance sheet profit was actually greater than planned.

Table 7 - Payments from profits during 2010

Payments: Income tax (20%) Payment for production assets Interest on loan

18937,4 17250 4300

From it it was transferred to: - reserve fund, - accumulation fund, - consumption fund.

11200 13756 22181

Remains at the disposal of the enterprise

The current regional management system is not sufficiently effective and mature; it rejects old forms and methods in the absence or insufficient development of new structures and sufficiently effective mechanisms for the implementation of management functions. To manage the regional economy in development, it is necessary to carry out restructuring in the regional management system. .

Labor market: concept, features and shaping factors

Organization of business activities

The key figure in market relations is the entrepreneur.

Organization and improvement of production efficiency

The task is to analyze the duration of the production cycle for the release of a specific type of product.

Many Russian companies know first-hand what budgeting is. However, when it comes to monitoring budget execution and analyzing it, most firms are faced with many questions: how to carry out control, who should do it, how to evaluate deviations that have arisen.

The concept of budgetary control is based on two concepts: plan and fact. The purpose of monitoring and analyzing the implementation of planned budget indicators is to manage deviations that affect financial results. In the process of control, the budget controller, firstly, collects, processes and analyzes information about the actual results of financial and economic activities. Secondly, it identifies deviations from planned values ​​and analyzes their causes. Thirdly, makes management decisions to adjust plans and budgets in permissible cases.

To carry out these functions, it is important to establish an effective control system.

Proven Methods

A company may implement many different methods of budget control. Many of them are highly specialized and quite complex (for example, the “earned value” method for assessing project budget execution). We will focus on two generally accepted methods:

  • control of budgets based on deviations;
  • operational control of payments (treasury control).

A company's budget is a financial plan of action to achieve profitability. Therefore, the basis of the control system should be cost control. To implement it, a calculation of deviations is used, during which:

  • identify deviations based on management accounting data (if the homogeneity of planned and actual data is ensured);
  • evaluate deviations from the point of view of their impact on the planned result;
  • determine the nature of deviations (for example, regular or random) and their causes, which can be either internal or associated with unforeseen changes in external conditions;
  • prepare recommendations and possible management decisions based on deviation analysis.

These functions are usually performed by financial and economic services: the economic planning department or the budget planning department (depending on the organizational structure of the enterprise).

To identify deviations, specialists from the financial and economic service compare actual and planned data item by item. And in order to assess the impact of deviations on the planned result, they use the calculation of the share of individual items. The example (see table) shows the calculation of deviations of actual values ​​from planned ones: for income items (sales of goods) the formula “fact” - “plan” is used, for expense items the formula “plan” - “fact” is used.

We see that the company received 50,000 rubles less profit than planned. To determine the impact of income and expense items on this deviation, you need to calculate the specific gravity using the formula:

(“deviation by item” / “deviation by profit”) x 100%

In the "Variance" column, we received data that suggests that the actual profit received is 25 percent lower than planned. This, in turn, is 60 percent due to the fact (column “Share”) that fixed costs have increased. And, accordingly, by 40 percent - due to the fact that sales have decreased.

Based on these calculations, a specialist from the financial and economic service prepares an analytical note on recommendations for correcting the current situation in the next reporting period. For example, according to these calculations, an enterprise needs to increase sales by 20,000 rubles and reduce expenses under the item “Security” by 10,000 rubles, and under the item “Wages” - by 30,000 rubles. At the same time, the company has a reserve of 10,000 rubles for additional rental costs.

Deviation control by its nature is “control after the transaction has occurred.” It is not able to prevent a single fact of financial and economic activity that leads to an unfavorable change. But it is effective over long budget periods if carried out on a regular basis. That is, by controlling deviations that arise in monthly budgets, you can make management decisions in time and align the indicators for the year. For example, based on the results of nine months, a company receives data on overexpenditure of funds under the items “Consumables” and “Advertising”. Accordingly, it is necessary to make adjustments to the 4th quarter budget: reduce expenses on relevant items by setting strict limits or control of treasury budget execution. As a result, this will eliminate the excess that has arisen.

Deviation assessment and analysis

Before performing a variance analysis of budget items or indicators, it is necessary to determine which variances are primarily important. For example, there is no need for a company to analyze the deviation of such an indicator as the exchange rate - this is an external environment that is not controlled by the enterprise. And, on the contrary, the indicators “production cost” or “product sales cost” can be controlled. To do this, it is enough to determine the cost structure. Next, you need to determine the limit of permissible deviations. As a rule, it is set as a percentage of the planned value. The magnitude of these deviations can reach 10 percent, but on average varies at the level of three to five percent. Determining the limit is a rather subjective assessment. As a rule, companies are guided by the specific gravity of this article. If the share of the “Salaries” item is 30 percent of all costs, then the planning will be more accurate and the limit of permissible deviations will be 0.5-1 percent. When planning, for example, office expenses that make up 0.05-0.1 percent of total costs, the deviation limit can be set at 5-10 percent.

Budget execution control and analysis are usually carried out by economic planning services. To analyze budget execution, such types of analysis as ranking, factor analysis, plan-fact analysis, and others are used.

Ranking is used when it is necessary to conduct a comparative analysis of functional centers of responsibility, business units, branches, etc. according to budget items. At the same time, the most profitable and/or most unprofitable divisions or areas of activity are identified. For example, ranking is effectively used when comparing sales budgets across branches.

Factor analysis is intended to identify factors that influenced changes in the values ​​of the analyzed budget items or indicators. With this type of analysis, it is possible, for example, to determine the impact of each branch on the total amount of sales of goods and services. The essence of factor analysis is to determine the cause of deviations in indicators and develop recommendations for eliminating them. Above we looked at an example of identifying deviations from the planned result. The share of each item in the overall change in the financial result was determined. Thus, we conducted a factor analysis.

Plan-actual analysis can be carried out both for all main and for individual operating budgets. Its main goal is to identify the causes of deviations, namely, which of the indicators, budget items, and scenario conditions influenced the execution of the company’s budget.

The methods presented are simple and effective in assessing deviations, which is why most Russian companies use them.

Treasury control

An essential component of the control system is control of treasury budget execution. That is, control of the receipt and expenditure of funds that are planned in the cash flow budget.

Operational control of the cash flow budget is usually carried out by the budget controller. He, guided by the approved cash limits, determines budget items for financing above-plan expenses. The financial controller evaluates each incoming application for settlements and determines whether it exceeds the limit for the corresponding budget item. Exceeding the limits in the budget period may only be permitted by special order of an authorized official. This is usually the CFO or CEO. But when it comes to the redistribution of expenses between various budget items, these powers, as a rule, are assigned to the financial controllers themselves.

Treasury control is very often used in holdings, where the management company manages the funds of the branches. The branches themselves only initiate the payment, and the financial department of the parent company compares its amount with the data included in the budget. And after that he makes a decision about payment.

Example

Branches of one gold mining company located in different regions do not manage funds, with the exception of paying wages to staff. All other expenses are paid by the parent company located in Moscow. The existing treasury control system regulates all cash flow operations. But at the same time, it has sufficient flexibility and provides the ability to redistribute cash flows, if necessary, between various branches or budget items of expenditure. The system allows you to increase the efficiency of using the company's funds. For example, when at one of the branches there is a need to pay for unplanned equipment repair work, the company does not have to take out additional loans.

However, it is worth noting that this technique is not always effective. A typical mistake with this type of control is rigidly setting limits on all items and a poorly-functioning system for adjusting the budget. In such cases, the enterprise lacks flexibility and is unable to quickly respond to changes. Businesses should take this into account.

Example

Thus, the budget of one metallurgical plant strictly regulated the costs of writing off technological materials for production. The purchase of these materials was calculated based on the planned write-off amount. Then production technology changed. In this regard, there was a need to increase consumption rates and purchase more expensive technological materials. At the same time, production volume had to remain at the same level. The amount specified in the application for the purchase of materials was significantly higher than established. Therefore, the financial controller, guided by planned data, reduced it. After all, adjustments to purchasing costs were allowed only in the event of an increase in production volume. As a result, this led to a decrease in production volumes in the next reporting period.