home · Initiation · Displacement l l pike type. Silent "Pike-B"

Displacement l l pike type. Silent "Pike-B"

Dimensions Surface displacement 8140 t Displacement underwater 12,770 t Maximum length
(according to KVL) 110.3 m Body width max. 13.6 m Average draft
(according to KVL) 9.7 m Power point Atomic. 1 reactor type OK-650 M (190 MW) on thermal neutrons, two auxiliary electric motors of 410 hp each. s., only on the 972MT there are two diesel generators DG-300 of 750 liters each. With. 1 emergency ed powered by battery Armament Torpedo-
mine weapons 4x650 mm TA (12 torpedoes)
4×533 mm TA (28 torpedoes) Missile weapons IRS Caliber-PL for 533-mm TA (formerly S-10 "Granat"), instead of some torpedoes, underwater missiles and missile-torpedoes Air defense MANPADS "Strela-3 M", 3 launch containers, 18 missiles Media files on Wikimedia Commons

History of creation

The decision to develop a mass series of third-generation multipurpose submarines was made in July 1976. The boat was designed by SKB-143 Malachite. Until 1997, the work was led by the chief designer G. N. Chernyshev, after his death - Yu. I. Farafontov. The technical specifications were left the same as those of Project 945 "Barracuda", the work of the Lazurit Central Design Bureau, and the design was carried out on its basis, so work was not carried out at the preliminary design stage. Unlike the Barracuda, the boat’s hull was supposed to be made not of titanium, but of low-magnetic steel. This proposal was made by shipbuilders from Komsomolsk-on-Amur. This requirement was due to both the shortage and high cost of titanium, as well as the difficulties in working with it, which could only be overcome by one Soviet enterprise, Sevmash, as well as the Gorky enterprise "Krasnoye Sormovo" whose capacity was clearly insufficient for the construction of a large series in a fairly short time deadlines. At the same time, replacing titanium with steel made it possible to use the increased capacity of Far Eastern factories. On September 13, 1977, the technical design was approved, but due to the construction in the United States of a new type of Los Angeles submarine with a new generation of hydroacoustic systems, the Shchuka-B was sent for revision.

The improved project was ready by 1980. The first part of the series was built in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, which was caused by the increased level of production and technical potential of the Far Eastern shipyards.

In the early 1980s, the Soviet Union purchased a batch of high-precision metal-cutting machines from the Japanese company Toshiba, which made it possible to use new technologies in the processing of propellers, which sharply reduced the noise of submarines. The deal was secret, but information about it reached the world press. As a result, the US imposed economic sanctions against the company.

Project 971 boats received the code name “Akula” in NATO countries. Later, the project was improved several times, and boats built according to the modified designs received the code names “Improved Akula” (Russian) in the West. "Improved Shark"), Project 971M corresponds to the designation “Akula-II”. The last of the boats built, K-335 "Gepard", the embodiment of the latest technical achievements, is called "Akula-III" in the West.

Design

Frame

Project 971 has a two-hull design. Durable housing made of high quality alloy steel with σ t = 1 GPa (10,000 kgf/cm²). To simplify the installation of equipment, the boat was designed using zone blocks, which made it possible to transfer a significant amount of work from the cramped conditions of the submarine compartments directly to the workshop. After installation is completed, the zone unit is “rolled” into the boat’s hull and connected to the main cables and pipelines of the ship’s systems. A two-stage depreciation system is used: all mechanisms are placed on shock-absorbing foundations, in addition, each zone block is isolated from the body by rubber-cord pneumatic shock absorbers. In addition to reducing the overall noise of the nuclear submarine, this scheme makes it possible to reduce the impact of underwater explosions on equipment and crew. The boat has a developed vertical tail unit with a streamlined boule, which houses a towed antenna. The submarine is also equipped with two folding thrusters and retractable bow horizontal rudders with flaps. A special feature of the project is the smoothly coupled connection of the tail unit with the body. This is done to reduce hydrodynamic turbulence that creates noise.

Boat noise at 4-8 knots 90-110 dB per 1 Pa at a distance of 1 m

Power point

Energy supply is provided by a nuclear power plant. The lead boat, K-284 "Akula", is equipped with an OK-650M.01 pressurized water nuclear reactor. On later orders, the nuclear power plant has minor improvements. Some sources report that subsequent boats are equipped with OK-9VM type reactors. The thermal power of the reactor is 190 MW, the shaft power is 50,000 liters. With. Two auxiliary electric motors in the folding outboard columns have a power of 410 hp each. s., there is one diesel generator ASDG-1000.

Crew accommodation

Living conditions are somewhat improved compared to project 671RTMK "Pike". The entire crew is housed in the 2nd living compartment in cabins. In the remaining compartments, personnel stand watch and perform their official duties.

Armament

"Shchuka-B" is armed with a torpedo-missile system, including 4 torpedo tubes of 650 mm caliber and 4 torpedo tubes of 533 mm caliber, ammunition is 40 units, including 12 650 mm caliber and 28 533 mm caliber.

The following 650 mm caliber ammunition can be used: 65-76 torpedoes, anti-submarine missile systems PLRK-6 “Vodopad” and PLRK-7 “Wind” with the ability to install a nuclear charge.

The 533 mm caliber devices are equipped with the Grinda torpedo preparation system and can use torpedoes, in particular deep-sea torpedoes UGST and electric homing torpedoes USET-80, missile-torpedoes (type APR-ZM), anti-submarine guided missiles (PLUR) model 83R, underwater missiles M5 Shkval, C-10 Granat nuclear-tipped cruise missiles designed to destroy aircraft carriers, are currently being developed into the Kalibr-PL complex. It is also possible to lay both conventional and self-transporting mines through torpedo tubes.

The weapon system used allows the Shchuka-B to fight submarines and surface ships, as well as hit ground targets with high-precision cruise missiles.

Modifications

Project 971 boats received the code name “Akula” in NATO countries. Later the project was improved several times:

Service history

In the same year, another “Pike-B” with a crew under the command of Captain 1st Rank A.V. Burilichev, while on combat service in the far reaches of the Atlantic, discovered a US Navy SSBN and secretly watched it go on combat patrol. After that campaign, the crew commander was awarded the title of Hero of the Russian Federation.

Comparative assessment

In June-July 2012, the submarine remained undetected by the US Navy in the Gulf of Mexico for several weeks.

Some experts are skeptical about comparing Project 971 with fourth-generation boats, considering the performance estimates to be overestimated.

"Los Angeles" "Pike" "Pike-B" "Barracuda" "Condor" "Fin" "Ruby"
Appearance
Years of construction - - - - - - -
Years of service c c c c c c- c
Built 62 15 15 2 2 1 6
Displacement (t)
surface
underwater
6082
7177
6990
7250
8140
12770
5940
9600
6470
10400
5880
8500
2410
2607
Speed ​​(kt)
surface
underwater
17
30-35
11,6
31
11,6
33
19
35
19
35
11
33
15
25
Immersion depth (m)
working
ultimate
280
450
400
600
480
600
480
550
520
600
1000
1250
300

Reaction

Original text (English)

The Improved Akula SSN, which went to sea in 1990, soon revealed that the Soviets had surpassed the U.S. Navy in some areas of acoustic quieting--the Improved Akula was quieter than our newest attack submarines, the Improved LOS ANGELES class .

In the same speech, Polmar quoted the words of the Commander of US Naval Operations, Admiral Jeremy Michael Boorda:

For the first time since we launched the Nautilus, a situation has arisen that the Russians have submarines at sea that are quieter than ours. As you know, low noise is the main quality for submarines.

Representatives

In total, the project planned to build 25 ships: 13 in Komsomolsk-on-Amur and 12 in Severodvinsk. In 1983-1993, 20 submarines were laid down, of which 14 were completed (seven at each plant); 10 of them are part of the Russian Navy, on the last of them - K-335 "Geetah" the flag was raised on December 4, 2001 in the presence of the President and Supreme Commander-in-Chief V. Putin. Two submarines, Lynx and Cougar, were not completed, and the hulls were used in the construction of Project 955-955A, like the K-535 Yuri Dolgoruky and K-550 Alexander Nevsky; another one, K-152 Nerpa, was launched only in 2006 and was originally intended for leasing to India, as a result of which it had differences in the installed equipment. As of May 2011, the submarine was located in Bolshoy Kamen, where the Vostok plant is located. On April 4, 2012, the submarine was officially inducted into service with the Indian Navy at the Visakhapatnam base.

Table colors:
White - not completed or disposed of without being launched
Green - operating as part of the Russian Navy
Yellow - operating as part of foreign navies or as a civilian ship
Blue - is under repair or modernization
Red - written off, scrapped or lost

Plant named after Lenin Komsomol No. 199, Komsomolsk-on-Amur

Name Head No. Bookmark Launching Commissioning Status
K-284 "Shark" 501 11.11.1983 22.07.1984 30.12.1984 Written off. Disposed of at the Zvezda Shipyard in 2008.
K-263 "Barnaul"
502 09.05.1985 28.05.1986 30.12.1987 In the sludge in Bolshoy Kamen. A recycling competition has been announced.
K-322 "Sperm Whale" 513 05.09.1986 18.07.1987 30.12.1988 As part of the Pacific Fleet. Renovations are underway in Komsomolsk-on-Amur.
K-391 "Bratsk"
514 23.02.1988 14.04.1989 29.12.1989 As part of the Pacific Fleet. In 09.2014, she was delivered to the Zvezdochka shipyard to undergo mid-term repairs and modernization. The renovation is scheduled to be completed in 2019.
K-331 "Magadan"
515 28.12.1989 23.06.1990 31.12.1990 As part of the Pacific Fleet. On June 28, 2015, it was located on the territory of the Zvezda Shipyard in Bolshoy Kamen, awaiting the next repair.
K-419 "Kuzbass"
516 28.07.1991 18.05.1992 31.12.1992 As part of the Pacific Fleet. 03/19/2016 returned to the Pacific Fleet.
K-295 "Samara"
517 07.11.1993 15.08.1994 17.07.1995 As part of the Pacific Fleet. In September 2014, it was delivered to the Zvezdochka shipyard to undergo mid-term repairs and modernization. The renovation is scheduled to be completed in 2019.
K-152 "Nerpa" 518 1993 24.06.2006 29.12.2009 On January 23, 2012, it was officially transferred to India.
"Irbis" 519 1994 Funding stopped in 1996. As of 2002, the readiness was 42%, it was being completed according to project 971I. In 2011, after the transfer of the K-152 Nerpa to India was delayed for 3 years, it was decided to stop the construction of nuclear submarines at the Amur Plant. A durable body has been formed. The Indian Ministry of Defense is ready to finance the completion of the second nuclear submarine of Project 971 “Pike-B”, and then lease this ship. As of December 17, 2014, an agreement was signed to supply India with a second nuclear submarine, the construction of which will be carried out by the Amur plant. The second nuclear submarine is already being built at the Amur plant according to the same design (971 Shchuka-B) as the first, called Nerpa.
TO-? 520 1991 03/18/1992 canceled when 25% complete
TO-? 521 1990 03/18/1992 canceled with 12% readiness

Northern Machine-Building Enterprise No. 402, Severodvinsk

Name Head No. Bookmark Launching Commissioning Status
K-480 "Ak Bars" 821 22.02.1985 16.04.1988 29.12.1988 Put into reserve in 1998, excluded on October 1, 2002 and transferred to the OFI. In 2007, it was towed to the Zvezdochka shipyard for cutting into scrap metal. Disposed of. Sections of the hull were used to build the K-551 "Vladimir Monomakh" project 955. According to some reports, this was the reason for the ship's disposal.
K-317 "Panther" 822 06.11.1986 21.05.1990 27.12.1990 As part of the Northern Fleet. From 2006 to 2008 it underwent a major overhaul and modernization.
K-461 "Wolf" 831 14.11.1987 11.06.1991 29.12.1991 As part of the Northern Fleet. From August 14, 2014 to 2019, it undergoes medium repairs and deep modernization at the Zvezdochka Shipyard.
K-328 "Leopard" 832 26.10.1988 28.06.1992 30.12.1992 As part of the SF. From the end of June 2011 until 2019, the ship undergoes medium repairs and modernization at the Zvezdochka Shipyard.
K-154 "Tiger" 833 10.09.1989 26.06.1993 29.12.1993 As part of the SF. According to the NATO classification - “Improved Akula class”, it stands out for its increased acoustic stealth.
K-157 "Vepr" 834 13.07.1990 10.12.1994 25.11.1995 As part of the Northern Fleet (under repair). Will be transferred to the Navy in 2019.
K-335 "Cheetah" 835 23.09.1991 17.09.1999 03.12.2001 As part of the SF. According to NATO classification - “Akula-III” with a modified hull design and new equipment. On December 4, 1997, she inherited the Guards flag from the submarine K-22. At 11.2015, the repairs with the VTG were completed.
K-337 "Cougar" 836 18.08.1992 K-550 "Alexander Nevsky" project 955
K-333 "Lynx" 837 31.08.1993 Not completed, hull sections were used in the construction of the K-535 “Yuri Dolgoruky” Project 955

Current state

All completed boats of the project, except three, were in service until the early 2000s and were part of the Northern and Pacific fleets, based at Yagelnaya Bay (now Gadzhievo) (SF) and in the village of Rybachy (Pacific Fleet). As of the beginning of 2017, 4 submarines of the project are combat-ready; 3 - at the Northern Fleet and one - at the TF, the rest are under repair or conservation.

The lead boat of the project, K-284 "Akula", was excluded from the fleet's operational strength and has been laid up at the Pacific Fleet base in Pavlovsky Bay since at least 1996. The K-480 Ak Bars was withdrawn from the fleet in 1998 and was in long-term storage in Yagelnaya Bay. In 2007, K-480 was towed to the Zvezdochka shipyard for cutting into metal. Unfinished structures of Sevmash boats K-337 "Cougar" And K-333 "Lynx" were used in the construction of the strategic missile carrier "Yuri Dolgoruky" of Project 955 "Borey". Two of the four unfinished boats of the plant named after. Lenin Komsomol was canceled in the early stages of readiness, the third boat, K-152 Nerpa, was completed and on January 23, 2012 officially leased to the Indian Navy for $650 million for a period of 10 years. Interestingly, in the Indian Navy the Nerpa will be named Chakra. Previously, this name was borne by the Soviet nuclear submarine K-43 of project 670 "Scat", which was part of the Indian fleet on leasing terms in 1988-1992 and over the years became a good base for training Indian submariners: many sailors who served on the first "Chakra" subsequently occupied important positions in the country's navy, including eight who rose to the rank of admiral. The terms of the contract with India also provide for the completion and lease to the Indian side of the fourth of the unfinished boats in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, the readiness of which as of 2002 was 42%.

Three boats: “Wolf”, “Tiger” and “Leopard” are patronized by the districts of Nizhny Novgorod.

In 2014, a deep modernization of nuclear submarines began at the Zvezdochka shipyard. The first modernized boats are K-328 "Leopard", K-461 "Wolf", K-391 "Bratsk" and K-295 "Samara". In total, it was planned to modernize 6 boats.

Accidents

On November 8, 2008, during tests in the Sea of ​​Japan, as a result of unauthorized activation of the LOX fire extinguishing system on board the K-152 Nerpa, 20 people died - 17 civilians and 3 military. Another 21 people were hospitalized (later another 20 people from civilian specialists sought help. There were 208 people on board the nuclear submarine at the time of the accident, 81 of them were military personnel. .

Notes

  1. K-322, “Sperm Whale” Project 971
  2. See K-152 "Nerpa"
  3. Silent “Super Sharks” armed with “Calibers” Izvestia, April 28, 2017.
  4. "Gepard" - the first nuclear submarine cruiser of the 21st century, Igor Lisochkin, shipbuilding.ru
  5. Fedorov, Vyacheslav WEAPONS OF RUSSIA. "Cheetah": Underwater hunter. (undefined) . Fedorov Military Library (2000-2008). Retrieved March 13, 2008. Archived August 25, 2011.
  6. “Panther” is being tested, Andrey Gavrilenko, “Red Star” (rosprom.gov.ru), 01/18/2007
  7. Mikhailov, Andrey The “Silent Hunter” of the Deep turns 20 years old (undefined) (unavailable link). Rosprom. Federal Agency for Industry. 06/21/2004 (PRAVDA.Ru, 06/16/2004). Retrieved March 13, 2008. Archived January 29, 2012.
  8. What is known about the character of noise created by submarines? Appendix 1 - The Future of Russia’s Strategic Nuclear Forces - by Eugene Miasnikov, Center for Arms Control, …
  9. Yu. V. Apalkov “Submarines” vol.1 part 2, “Galeya Print”, St. Petersburg, 2002
  10. Myasnikov, Victor Strategic missiles flew to China and Iran (undefined) . nvo.ng.ru(07/07/2006). Retrieved March 14, 2008. Archived January 29, 2012.

In the seas and oceans, the USSR Navy was required to take adequate steps at all times to eliminate the likely threat. It was necessary not only to maintain parity in nuclear submarines that carried nuclear missiles, but also to have effective means of countering strike formations of a potential enemy’s fleet. After a long search for an effective anti-submarine warfare weapon, it was decided to build Project 971 multi-purpose attack submarines.

The new ships were supposed to secretly conduct underwater reconnaissance, monitoring the movements of missile submarines of Western countries, and, if necessary, act proactively.

How the new Project 971 Shchuki nuclear submarines were created

It should be noted that the idea of ​​​​creating a submarine ship capable of effectively fighting the submarines of a potential enemy at sea appeared immediately after the entry into service of the American fleet of Los Angeles-class nuclear submarines. The submarines at the disposal of the Soviet fleet were not suitable for searching for enemy ships in the depths of the world's oceans. The main disadvantage of the second generation Soviet nuclear submarines was the high noise level of the underwater operation. This especially affected the combat effectiveness of Soviet nuclear submarines, which could no longer compete on equal terms with the 3rd generation submarines that appeared in foreign fleets.

Project 971 was a continuation of the practical implementation of the construction of titanium nuclear attack submarines of Project 945. The main goal of the project was to expand the scale of construction of cheaper multi-purpose submarines. The new project was based on the main components and assemblies of Project 945 submarines. Instead of a titanium hull, the new nuclear submarines were to have steel hulls of a similar shape, similar tactical and technical data, including autonomy and range. In terms of speed, diving depth and armament, Project 971 submarines should have had similar parameters. Particular emphasis in Project 971 was placed on significantly reducing the noise level of the boat. This factor was to play a key role in the subsequent operation of the new class of submarines.

The Project 971 submarine received the code "Pike-B", thereby repeating the glorious combat history of the "Pikes", medium-sized submarines of the Second World War. The design documentation provided for the construction of 3rd generation multi-purpose submarines in a large series, which were supposed to replace the obsolete Project 671 Shchuka-type boats in the fleet. The technical specifications for the new Shchuka appeared in the summer of 1976. A year later, the new submarine received its shape through the efforts of SKB-143 Malachite. This design bureau already had experience in building ocean-going submarines, so the “Gorky project” did not have to be adjusted to new factory conditions.

Only in 1980 were the final technical improvements completed and production documentation drawn up. In 1983, the first nuclear submarine of Project 971 was laid down, which received the formidable name “Shark”. The submarine was supposed to mark the beginning of a large series of multi-purpose submarines with improved seaworthiness and hydroacoustic characteristics.

Stages of construction of new nuclear submarines "Pike"

The situation that developed at sea in the mid-80s forced the country's top naval leadership to make every effort to increase the combat capability of the ocean-going submarine fleet. Tasks aimed at reducing noise levels and increasing the firepower of submarines formed the basis of the new project. The first submarine received serial number No. 501 and was laid down at the shipbuilding plant named after. Lenin Komsomol in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. In the summer of 1984, the ship was launched and entered service in the new year of 1985.

All subsequent ships of the new series, the Shchuka-B multipurpose submarines of Project 971, were simultaneously built at two shipyards in the country, in Komsomolsk on the Amur and at Sevmash in Severodvinsk. A total of 15 ships were launched, of which 8 became part of the Pacific Fleet, and the other 7 formed the strike core of the Northern Fleet.

The first ship of the series, the Akula submarine, showed unique results already on its first voyage. In terms of underwater noise, the Soviet submarine surpassed its direct competitor, the American Los Angeles-class nuclear submarine.

For reference: The secret of the success of Soviet designers and shipbuilders was a new technique for processing propellers. For the first time, high-precision foreign equipment was used at shipyards involved in the construction of submarines - Japanese milling machines of the Toshiba brand. As a result, it was possible to significantly improve the quality of metalworking of the propeller blades of the submarine, which was reflected in the reduction in the noise level of the rotating propeller.

Project 971, according to the Western classification "Akula -II", became an unpleasant surprise for the American naval forces. From now on, American attack submarines and missile carriers could not freely sail near Soviet shores. Every movement of a potential enemy submarine was controlled by the new Soviet pikes.

At the government level, it was decided to give the new ships names similar to the names of Soviet cities. For example, the sixth nuclear submarine of the Shchuka-B type received the name Magadan after launching. However, three years later the submarine received a new name, K-331 Narwhal. The ship sailed with this name until January 2001.

All nuclear submarines of the Shchuka-B type commissioned in the Far East as part of the Pacific Fleet were named after the names of Russian cities. So, after the Akula boat, the lead ship of Project 971, the Far Eastern shipbuilders followed the Barnaul nuclear submarine and in 1989 the Bratsk nuclear submarine. Then it was the turn of the nuclear-powered icebreaker Magadan, which was launched in December 1990. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, already in 1992, the Kuzbass multi-purpose submarine entered service with the Pacific Fleet. Laid down in 1993 on a slipway in Komsomolsk on the Amur, the K-419 Samara submarine was already being completed to replace the Soviet era. The submarine entered service in July 1995.

The only ship that stood out among the group of new ships by its name was the K-322 Sperm Whale nuclear submarine, which entered service with the Pacific Fleet in 1988.

Having received the first real confirmation of the correctness of the chosen technical solutions as a result of the implementation of Project 971, the construction of submarines of the Shchuka-B type began actively at the Severodvinsk Machine-Building Enterprise. Sevmash became home to most Soviet nuclear-powered ships. The fate of the second series of Project 971 boats, assembled at the Sevmash shipyards and commissioned by the Northern Fleet, was no exception.

Design features of Project 971 nuclear submarines

Project 971 nuclear submarines were initially built as fighters of enemy submarine missile carriers, so powerful weapons were installed on the ships. In terms of combat potential, modern “Pikes” were significantly superior to all domestic analogues and were much stronger than foreign combat submarines of the same class.

Together with the Barracuda-class submarines, the new attack nuclear submarines were supposed to form the backbone of the USSR Navy to counter the potential enemy’s naval strike groups on the Northern and Eastern flanks. Using their high tactical and technical characteristics, stealth and greater autonomy, the new “Pikes” could be successfully used for special operations throughout the world’s oceans.

Nuclear submarines were to be armed with new Granat cruise missiles and a digital sonar system.

The main design features of Project 971 nuclear-powered ships were the complete automation of the main technological and combat processes. All control of the ship was concentrated in a single main command post. The automation system for ship processes and control made it possible to significantly reduce the crew on the Project 971 Pike. The warship was served by 73 sailors and officers, which is almost two times less than on the main multi-purpose nuclear submarine of the US Navy Los Angeles class. The living conditions of the personnel on the new ships have also improved, and the living conditions for the crew at sea for a long time have improved.

One of the innovative solutions applicable to the design of the ship is the organization of a rescue system for the ship’s crew in emergency situations. Boats of the Shchuka-B type were equipped with a pop-up rescue chamber designed for the entire crew (73 people).

Hull and power plant of the nuclear submarine "Pike"

The first nuclear-powered icebreaker of Project 971, the Shchuka-B type, was a double-hulled ship. The main strong hull of the ship is steel, made of high-strength steel. The hull of the boat was divided into compartments in such a way that all combat posts and main control units of the ship were located in separate isolated areas. The interior of the boat had a frame, stacked structure with passages and decks. Due to the two-stage depreciation of each block, it was possible to achieve a significant reduction in production noise and reduce the acoustic signal emitted by working mechanisms and the crew. Each block in the ship was isolated from the pressure hull by pneumatic shock absorbers, creating a second level of vibration isolation.

For example, on the Northern Fleet submarine K-317 “Panther”, rubber shock absorbers and silicone gaskets were tested for the first time on the main operating mechanisms. As a result, the noise of the operating steam turbine unit of the nuclear reactor and electric motors decreased by 30-40%.

On all subsequent ships launched from the Sevmash slipways, parts and mechanisms made of synthetic materials were installed. The noise levels produced by Project 971 submarines of the Northern Fleet remain the lowest today.

During the construction of the boats, the technology of block assembly of the main ship structures was used. Installation of equipment was now carried out not in the cramped conditions of the boat hull, but directly on stands in the factory workshops. Upon completion of assembly, the unit was installed in the ship’s hull, after which it was connected to the main communications of the boat. Innovations introduced into the project, the presence of a rescue chamber for the crew and a hull made of high-strength steel led to an increase in the ship's displacement to 8 thousand tons.

For reference: the submarine's original design displacement was 6-7 thousand tons, but subsequent changes led to the weight of the ship when loaded.

The ship's propulsion system and energy supply system were based on the operation of one OK-650B nuclear reactor, which communicated with four steam generators. As a backup power unit, a single-shaft steam turbine was installed on the boat, which had a full backup set of mechanization for all processes. The total power of the power plant is 50 thousand hp. As a result, the nuclear-powered ship could develop a surface speed of 11 knots, and under water, at least 33 knots.

The seven-blade propeller with improved hydrodynamics was driven by two electric motors.

The backup power plant consisted of two DG-300 diesel engines, which provided power supply and propulsion of the ship in emergency situations. The supply of diesel fuel was designed for a 10-day voyage on backup engines.

Ship armament and navigation equipment

All the first boats in the series were produced with mine and torpedo armament and were equipped with RK-55 Granat missile systems. The torpedo armament consisted of 4 533 mm torpedo tubes and 4 650 mm caliber torpedo tubes. The main difference between the new class of submarines was the versatility of their weapons. The Granat missile system made it possible to fight all types of naval weapons. The mine and torpedo group was responsible for anti-submarine defense. Cruise missiles and rocket-torpedoes were launched through underwater torpedo tubes from any position of the ship.

Project 971 submarines “Wolf” and “Leopard”, which served in the Northern Fleet, like their counterparts in the Pacific Ocean, carried the new SKAT-KS sonar systems. Basic information was processed digitally. In addition to the SKAT sonar system, the new nuclear submarines were equipped with a unique system for detecting enemy ships by their wake.

Since the beginning of the 90s, new navigation equipment began to be installed on the Pike. The K-154 Tiger submarine has recently undergone modernization and is considered by Western experts to be a ship with increased stealth. The nuclear submarines Vepr and Samara are currently undergoing modernization of their propulsion systems and re-equipment with new hydroacoustic equipment. The ships are equipped with new navigation complexes “Medveditsa-971” and the space radio communication complex “Symphony”.

Today, all Project 971 ships in service in the Northern and Pacific Fleets are re-equipped with Caliber missile systems. Some of the boats have undergone modernization. The K-328 Leopard submarine, as well as the K-461 Volk nuclear-powered submarine, have undergone a radical modernization and are back in service. Nuclear-powered ships of a later production, the submarines K-335 “Gepard”, K-317, K-154 are considered today the main ships of the Northern Fleet.

Conclusion

The appearance of new Soviet nuclear submarines of the Shchuka-B type at sea came as a surprise to the fleets of Western countries. From that moment on, American submarines lost the ability to secretly conduct reconnaissance in the Northern Seas and the Pacific Ocean. The collapse of the Soviet Union prevented the massive construction and deployment of new nuclear-powered ships. However, despite their small numbers, first Soviet and then Russian Project 971 submarines continue to be the most powerful attack submarines of the Russian Navy today.

If you have any questions, leave them in the comments below the article. We or our visitors will be happy to answer them

Submarine Shch-139 and its crew

By the mid-30s of the 20th century, the Soviet Union made every effort to create a modern Navy capable of reliably covering the sea and ocean borders of the state. The lack of funds and the unpreparedness of the domestic industry to create a powerful surface fleet forced the leadership of the USSR to launch the massive construction of submarines in order to create a threat to the fleets of a potential enemy. The issue of defending ocean frontiers was especially pressing for the Far East, where we then had virtually no surface warships. In addition, there were no shipbuilding factories in the Far East. That is why it was decided to make submarines the basis of the combat power of the Pacific Fleet. New submarines were vigorously built at factories in Leningrad and Nizhny Novgorod, then they were disassembled by special trains and delivered to Vladivostok, where they were reassembled. The process is expensive and tedious, but there was simply no other way out. In total, in 1932–1940, 86 submarines of various designs were transported to the Pacific Ocean by trains. This was a truly titanic event, which, however, made it possible to create a powerful submarine fleet on the Far Eastern borders in a short time.

The submarines of the new X-series, which were being rapidly built in the mid-30s, absorbed all the best that Soviet ship designers had achieved by that time. The “pike”, which received the name Shch-315, also belonged to the new series. This submarine is the main character of our story, so let’s take a closer look at it.

The surface displacement of the new submarine was 592 tons, and the underwater displacement was 715 tons. With a length of 58 meters and a hull width of 6 meters, the “pike” had a draft of 4 meters - The armament of the Shch-315 included 3 45-mm guns, 4 bow and 2 stern torpedo tubes with a supply of 10 torpedoes and 2 machine guns to protect the boat from enemy aircraft. Maximum surface speed is 12 knots, underwater – 8 knots. The working depth of immersion is 75 meters, and the maximum depth is 90 meters. The estimated endurance at sea was 20 days. However, it was at this time that Pacific submariners on pikes began to significantly exceed the calculated standard by two and three times. The crew of the new submarine consisted of 37 people. In general, the new boat met the requirements of the time, although the speed left much to be desired.

The boat was laid down on December 17, 1934 at plant No. 112 "Krasnoe Sormovo" in Nizhny Novgorod under serial number 85 and was built mainly from parts manufactured at the Kolomensky Machine-Building Plant. On April 27, 1935, the new “pike” was launched. At first, the Shch-315, like many of its predecessors, was supposed to be sent in sections to the Far East, but then plans for the submarine changed. The fate of Shch-315 was decided differently.

On April 5, 1937 (according to other sources, in May 1937 or April 17, 1935), the submarine was launched. On December 5, 1937, the naval flag was raised on Shch-315, and she became part of the training division of submarines of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet. The first commander of the boat was Senior Lieutenant V.A. Egorov.

On July 17, 1938, in connection with the introduction of new numbering of submarines in the Soviet fleet, Shch-315 received a new designation - Shch-423. By the beginning of 1939, the boat had successfully completed the entire combat training course and trained the crew.

At that time, intensive development of the Northern Sea Route was underway in order to possibly test the inter-theater transfer of ships. The first successes of end-to-end navigation along the Northern Sea Route in both directions led the Navy leadership to the idea of ​​transporting a submarine to the Far East in this way. Of course, there were certain doubts: would the boat reach it or would it be crushed by the ice? But the foreign policy situation dictated that it was imperative to test the possibility of such a faster and more effective method of transferring submarines to the Pacific Ocean. Shch-423 was chosen to carry out this risky mission. There was also a change of commander; instead of the departed V.A. Egorov, Shch-423 was taken over by Senior Lieutenant Keiserman.

On May 9, 1939, the submarine began its passage along the White Sea-Baltic Canal from the Baltic to the North and on June 21, 1939, became part of the Northern Fleet. Here, senior lieutenant Alexey Matveevich Bysgrov took command of the submarine. However, it was not possible to immediately begin preparations for the difficult transition through the Arctic seas. The war with Finland began, and Shch-423 was left in the warring Northern Fleet. Now she was part of the 3rd division of the Northern Fleet submarine brigade.

Information varies about the participation of Shch-423 in the war. According to some sources, the boat was under repair, so it did not take part in hostilities; according to others, Shch-423 nevertheless went out on a combat mission and patrolled off the coast of Norway, between the port of Varde and Cape Nordkin, however, to no avail, since the Finnish ships never appeared in this area.

On May 20, 1940, immediately after the end of hostilities in Finland, a resolution was adopted by the Defense Committee under the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR on the transfer of one submarine of the Northern Fleet to the Pacific Ocean via the Northern Sea Route, which had never been carried out before. The choice of the commander of the Northern Fleet, Rear Admiral Drozd, fell on the Shch-423. This was no accident. The friendly and united crew of Shch-423 had extensive experience of sailing in the icy Barents Sea in difficult weather conditions and in ice. The young commander of the ship, Senior Lieutenant A. Bystroe, controlled it competently and confidently. The entire personnel consisted of Komsomol members and communists. The military commissar was senior political instructor V. Moiseev, and the mechanical engineer was military technician 1st rank G. Soloviev. The submariners understood the difficulties and risks of the upcoming voyage, but were proud of the responsible task. The command did not “strengthen the crew” with experienced specialists from other ships, breaking the existing connections and relationships, which, of course, had a positive effect on the mood of the people. No one needed to be reminded about responsibility, the quality of inspection and repair of mechanisms and devices.

Since May 25, the sailors, together with the workers of the Murmansk shipyard, have been working 14–16 hours a day to complete the work planned on time and thoroughly. The work to prepare the boat for the difficult voyage was led by naval engineer A. I. Dubravin, while the preparation of Shch-423 was supervised by the commander of the Northern Fleet, Rear Admiral V. P. Drozd, who visited the submarine several times, delving into all the details.

Military engineer 2nd rank A. Dubravin, appointed engineer of the special purpose expedition (EON-10), provided great practical assistance to the submariners. The design solutions he proposed for additional protection of the hull, rudders and propellers were accepted and tested in the Arctic ice. The hull of the Shch-423 was sheathed with a mixed wood-metal “fur coat” 150–200 mm thick, the bow horizontal rudders were removed, and instead of the standard stern ones, removable ones were installed on a shortened stock, which made it possible, if necessary, to remove and install them without docking. The bronze propellers were replaced with steel ones of smaller diameter, with replaceable blades. Instead of breakwater shields, specially made ones were installed at the upper bow and stern torpedo tubes, which could be easily and quickly removed by ship's means. At the end of the work, the upper torpedo tubes were shot with torpedo blanks, making sure that they could be used if there was a “fur coat”.

Considering the complexity of ice navigation, poor knowledge of some areas along the passage route, and the need for knowledge of the Pacific theater at the final stage, during the Arctic voyage the crew of Shch-423 was led by an experienced submariner, Captain 3rd Rank I. Zaidulin, and Senior Lieutenant A. Bystroe became his backup . The fate of Izmail Matigulovich, naval and human, still awaits its researchers.

From the memoirs of I. M. Zaidulin’s nephew, retired captain 1st rank I. Chefonov: “There is disappointingly little reliable information and archival documents about I. M. Zaidulins. A Tatar by nationality, a native of Adjara forever connected his life with the sea, with the navy, in 1922 he entered the school named after M. V. Frunze. He knew both the submarine and surface fleets. After college, he commanded torpedo and patrol boats, was a signalman on the destroyer Frunze, and then went through all the ranks, from navigator to commander on submarines. Simple and dignified in communication, he was an excellent storyteller, possessed an apt and sharp word, spoke about everything directly, even when it could affect his service and, apparently, it did. I think that as a submariner he can be fully characterized by the fact that before 1940 he commanded four types of submarines - “M”, “Shch”, “L” and “D”. In 1936, while commanding the Shch-123, he more than three times exceeded the established standard for autonomous navigation for this type of ship, for which the entire crew was awarded orders, and Zaidulin was awarded the Order of the Red Star. But tragic years followed for the command staff of the Red Army and Navy. Together with the commander of the 5th naval brigade, G. Kholostyakov, some submarine commanders were also arrested. But even that unjust court was forced to admit that they were not guilty of sabotage, espionage, terrorism and treason, that “Buk, Zaidulin, Bauman and Ivanovsky were not guilty of sabotage, but only committed official negligence... Sabotage in swimming in ice is false , since now all brigades swim like this. We were just the first...” After the release of Izmail Matigulovich, who had not lost faith in justice and the triumph of truth, in October 1939 he was appointed acting commander of the submarine D-2 of the Northern Fleet and only a little over 7 months later he was confirmed in this position. Perhaps these events influenced the fact that none of the submariners were awarded for the historical campaign of 1940. Zaidulin in a short time gained the authority of a competent, decisive and courageous commander and, like no one else, was suitable for this difficult transition.”

On July 22–24, in Motovsky Bay, all mechanisms and devices of the Shch-423 submarine were tested, controllability in the underwater (at a depth of 45 meters) and surface positions, stability, and maneuverability were checked, which turned out to be quite satisfactory. After completing the training, the crew was given a three-day rest. August 5, 1940 arrived. The ship arrived to see off Rear Admiral Drozd, who had just been removed from the post of commander of the Northern Fleet, and Rear Admiral Golovko, who had been newly appointed to this post. At 13:15 the boat departed from the Polyarny pier. The ice trek has begun.

The Barents Sea met the submariners inhospitably - it was stormy, and at times the boat found itself in stripes of thick fog. The difficult situation immediately demanded maximum attention from people in maintaining the mechanisms and controlling the ship. During this part of the journey, the submarine repeatedly sank and surfaced - it was necessary to maintain the crew's scuba diving skills while traveling through the ice.

According to ice reconnaissance data, there was compacted ice in the southwestern part of the Kara Sea, and therefore the “pike” went through the Matochkin Shar Strait, where it met with the icebreaker “Lenin” (since 1965 “Vladimir Ilyich”) and the transport “L Serov”, also included in EON-10. The ships carried 250 tons of various cargo and fuel for the expedition, including in case of forced wintering. On "L. Serov" also housed an emergency repair party headed by junior military technician N. Fedorov. Here, the stern horizontal rudders were removed from the submarine, which required 12–16 hours to install in place if diving was necessary.

The expedition was headed by military engineer 1st rank I. Sendik, who knew the Northern Theater well. To study the conditions of navigation in the Arctic seas, analyze and generalize his experience, a teacher of the naval academy, captain 1st rank E. Shwede, later a professor, doctor of naval sciences, and a student of the naval academy, captain-lieutenant M. Bibeev, were on the ships of the detachment.

In the Kara Sea, submariners received baptism on ice. On August 12, the ice conditions became more difficult to 8–9 points. I even had to stop moving. When forcing coarse ice, the roll sometimes reached 7–8°, and the trim up to 5–6°. For many hours on the bridge, open to the wind that burned their faces, the commanders had to carry out their difficult watch. It was impossible to turn away or hide from it - it was necessary to carefully monitor the maneuvers of the icebreaker, avoid dangerous approach to it, fit into its wake, avoid ice floes suddenly appearing from under the stern of the icebreaker, so that they would not fall under the submarine’s propellers . In such an environment, the skill of the commanders and the coherence of the actions of motorists who quickly worked out engine telegraph commands were tested. During the inspection on Dikson, there were no special comments on the submarine, which is the main indicator of its skillful control in the ice. But the transport was found to have a broken propeller blade.

We continued moving east on August 17 - first through clear water on our own, and from Tyrtov Island through the Vilkitsky Strait under the escort of icebreakers we entered the Laptev Sea. On this section of the route the ice thickness already reached 3–4 meters. During compression, ice blocks crawled onto the hull of the submarine, creating a roll of up to 10°. All the sailors off duty cleared the narrow, icy deck more than once and each time emerged victorious in the fight against the icy elements. The low temperature of the air and sea water, high humidity in the compartments worsened the living conditions on the ship and required a lot of physical effort from the sailors, but here they found a way out - from the ice cutter "F. Litka" supplied heating steam through a hose and dried all the compartments.

In this difficult situation, the Serov transport lost 2 more propeller blades. We had to reload the expedition's property in Tiksi Bay onto the Volga motor ship, which then proceeded as part of the EON. On August 31, the flight was continued.

The New Siberian Islands are left behind, and the boat is already in the East Siberian Sea. After the Bear Islands, the heavy multi-year ice became more and more compact, reaching 9–10 points. We had to use the help of the icebreaker Admiral Lazarev. A particularly difficult situation developed between capes Shelagsky and Billings. In some areas, the icebreakers escorted the submarine and the Volga one by one in a short tug. But these obstacles were overcome, and the “pike” entered the Chukchi Sea through the Long Strait. The experience of the path traveled in ice had an effect - the commanders were better oriented in the ice conditions, carried out maneuvers in a timely manner, and acted more in coordination with the captains of the icebreakers. Soon the EON-10 ships reached the Bering Strait. The personnel of Shch-423 were lined up on the deck, shots were fired from its cannons - a salute in honor of the conquest of the Arctic.

At the new theater, the northerners were met by a detachment of submarines of the Pacific Fleet under the command of Captain 2nd Rank F. Pavlov: L-7, L-8 and L-17. By the way, in 1938–1939 the L-7 was commanded by I. Zaidulin... And such a meeting with the mother ship! Beyond Cape Dezhnev, Shch-423 again had to pass a serious test of seamanship - the ship was caught in a severe storm. The list reached 46, sometimes the wave completely covered the wheelhouse, but both people and equipment passed the test. On September 9, the expedition arrived in Provideniya Bay, completing the passage along the Northern Sea Route.

The personnel were given rest, the sailors finally washed themselves in the bathhouse. The boat had stern horizontal rudders installed, it was marked and trimmed, and it sailed one mile at periscope depth. On the seventh day they went to sea. The hike continued. After calling at Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky and a short rest, Shch-423 entered the Sea of ​​Okhotsk through the 1st Kuril Strait. Soon the submariners were warmly welcomed in Sovetskaya Gavan.

Finally, the last section of the route was completed, and on October 17, 1940, at 7 hours 59 minutes, Shch-423 dropped anchor in Zolotoy Rog Bay in Vladivostok. The task of the Motherland was completed with honor. Behind the stern there were eight seas and two oceans, 7227 miles, of which 681 were covered in ice conditions. An evening dedicated to this heroic transition took place at the Saratov floating base. Ahead was service in the Pacific Fleet. From now on, Shch-423 forever entered the annals of the history of the Russian fleet. Subsequently, based on the results of the transition, it was decided to transfer the cruising boats K-21, K-22 and K-23 from Leningrad to the Pacific Ocean in this way, but the Great Patriotic War prevented this, and the Katyushas were left to fight in the north.

The Pacific Fleet command congratulated the crew on the completion of this historic voyage. The People's Commissar of the Navy expressed gratitude to the entire crew of the ship and awarded the participants of the campaign with the “Excellence in the RKKF” badge. There is information that Captain 2nd Rank Zaidulin was allegedly nominated for the title of Hero of the Soviet Union, then they changed their minds and were awarded... the same badge “Excellence in the RKKF.”

How did the fates of the participants in this legendary crossing develop in the future? Captain 2nd rank I. Zaidulin served in a submarine brigade during the Great Patriotic War, was a senior naval commander in Gelendzhik and commander of the OVR of the Kerch naval base. In 1943, he became the chief of staff of the training division of submarines of the Northern Fleet, preparing commanders for sailing and combat activities in the difficult conditions of the Arctic. It was not for nothing that the famous submariner, Hero of the Soviet Union I. Fisanovich considered him an older friend and mentor. In 1943–1944. Zaidulin is already in the Red Banner Baltic Fleet - first in the underwater diving department, and then in the OVR. During the landing operation in the Vyborg Bay, a covering detachment under his command sank 3 enemy ships “... with very limited forces and especially fire weapons in conditions of strong artillery opposition from enemy ships and coastal batteries. Personally, Comrade Zaidulin himself showed himself in this combat operation as an experienced and brave naval officer...” On August 26, he tragically died at sea on a boat mistakenly attacked by our aircraft, without ever learning that he had been awarded the rank of captain 1st rank and awarded the order Patriotic War 1st degree. The same order of the 2nd degree was also posthumously awarded to Lieutenant Commander A. Bystrov, who died a heroic death in the Black Sea Fleet. Captain 3rd rank M. Bibeev died on the Red Banner Guards submarine D-3 of the Northern Fleet, and on minesweeper No. 118 in the Kara Sea, petty officer 2nd class N. Nesterenko died.

But let's return to Shch-423. Upon arrival in the Far East, Shch-423 became part of the 33rd Division of the 3rd Submarine Brigade of the Pacific Fleet, based in Nakhodka.

On the day the Great Patriotic War began, June 22, 1941, Shch-423 was transferred to the 8th Division of the 3rd Submarine Brigade of the North Pacific Flotilla of the Pacific Fleet, based at Sovetskaya Gavan. And on April 17, 1942, the submarine once again changed its name. From now on it became known as Shch-139.

During the Great Patriotic War, the Pacific Fleet was considered a rear fleet, since it did not conduct combat operations. However, he suffered losses. In 1942, one after another, two “babies” disappeared without a trace during trips to sea. Presumably, both ended up on our own defensive minefields. Then a new tragedy. On July 18, 1942, a powerful explosion occurred on the Shch-138 stationed in Nikolaevsk-on-Amur. It was caused by the detonation of the charging compartments of spare torpedoes in the 2nd compartment. The ship sank instantly, taking with it the lives of 35 crew members.

The Shch-118 on the adjacent side was also damaged. Suspicion that sabotage had occurred on the submarine intensified after it was found out that the assistant commander of the boat, Lieutenant P. S. Egorov, who was on the shore at the time of the explosion, committed suicide. This gave reason to believe that it was he who committed sabotage and blew up the submarine. On September 29, the “pike” was raised with the help of the rescue ship “Telman”, but, taking into account the large volume of destruction, it was not restored.

On August 31, 1943, during night torpedo firing in the Gulf of America, due to a gross violation of navigation rules by the commander of the Shch-128, his boat rammed the side of the Shch-130, which sank at a depth of 36 meters. Three days later, she was picked up by the rescue ship Nakhodka. The personnel, with the exception of two killed in the collision, miraculously remained intact. The ship was repaired and put into operation in less than six months.

By the beginning of 1945, Shch-139 was part of the 2nd separate division of submarines of the Pacific Fleet and was based at the Vladimir-Oltan naval base. The division was commanded at that moment by not just anyone, but one of the most legendary submariners of the Soviet Union, Captain 1st Rank A.V. Tripolsky. Tripolsky's name thundered throughout the country back in 1940, when he was awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union for his military deeds during the Soviet-Finnish War. During the Great Patriotic War, Tripolsky's experience was used to the fullest. In 1942, it was he who commanded the difficult transition of a detachment of Pacific submarines across the Pacific and Atlantic oceans to the Northern Fleet. Our submariners had never made such ocean crossings before. Then Tripolsky was entrusted with another, no less responsible mission. He supervised the acceptance and passage from England to Polyarny of the B-type submarines handed over to us by the British, and after that he successfully commanded a division of these boats, personally going on military campaigns and sinking enemy ships.

In the spring of 1945, it was no coincidence that Captain 1st Rank Tripolsky again found himself in the Pacific Fleet, as commander of a pike division. There was simply no other second submariner with such vast ocean experience in our fleet at that time. Who, if not Tripolsky, should take our submarines out into the ocean to fight the Japanese fleet!

The chief of staff of the 2nd separate division was a “native Pacific” and experienced submariner, captain 2nd rank M.I. Kislov. Shch-139 itself was commanded by that time by Lieutenant Commander I. A. Pridatko. But things on one of the most famous boats of the Pacific Fleet were no longer as brilliant as when they served, as they say, “carelessly.”

From the testimony of the former division commander, Captain 2nd Rank Mironov: “Before Pridatko’s arrival, Shch-319 was one of the best boats in the division, the personnel were united, the discipline on the ship was quite satisfactory, the service organization was good. With the arrival of Pridatko, the discipline and organization of service on the ship noticeably deteriorated. The personnel and officers were opposed to him. He did not conduct educational work with personnel. By his activities on the shore, he undermined the authority of the officer - he sent personnel to collective farms “to earn money for the commander.” He himself went with his subordinates to work on collective farms. When dividing the earnings, he argued with the staff and almost got into fights. Spread gossip about higher commanders. He did not enjoy authority among the personnel and officers of either his own boat or other submarines. Pridatko’s personal discipline was low; in 1944 he had 8 disciplinary sanctions, and many offenses were limited to verbal instructions and instructions. Basically, all penalties were for poor organization on the ship. The ship was kept dirty, there was no struggle to keep the ship clean.”

From a special report from the special department of the NKVD for the Pacific Fleet: “The ship had serious deficiencies in the maintenance of the equipment, especially the engine and hold groups, as well as torpedo and artillery weapons. Precise equipment was not wiped with alcohol for 5-6 months, at the same time, when alcohol was supplied to the boat for these purposes, Pridatko used it for other purposes. The stern horizontal rudders were jammed by 15 degrees, as a result of which there were repeated cases of unacceptable trim of the submarine up to 30 degrees, which helped lead to the death of the ship. Knowing this, Pridatko did not take any measures to eliminate the defects.

Witness Korneev testified on this issue: “I once remember an incident where commander Pridatko did not dispense alcohol for wiping batteries for a month and a half. Sergeant Major Samarin was forced to write this down in the battery log. When checked by divisional specialists, it was established that the commander used alcohol on the submarine for other purposes.”

While in the next dock repair in December, Pridatko, despite the demands of the commander of the BC-1, senior lieutenant Cheremisin, for a thorough check of the acoustic equipment installed by Svyazmortrest, did not provide a thorough check of the installation, in a hurry to leave for his family in Rakushka Bay. Subsequently, it turned out that Svyazmortrest had installed faulty acoustic equipment; the acoustic readings were incorrect, which was one of the reasons for the collision of a submarine with a boat during an exercise in 1944.

In March 1944, due to the fault of Pridatko, a collision occurred with a MO boat, as a result of which the boat and boat were out of action for a long time, and material damage to the state was determined in the amount of 100,000 rubles.

In October 1944, Pridatko, having invited specialists from plant No. 202, foreman Silchenko, builder Dorenko and senior foreman Morozov, to the boat, organized group drunkenness in the battery compartment of the boat. While drinking, they smoked and burned matches, which could also lead to the death of the ship.

Witness Silchenko on this issue testified: “When we entered the boat, we went to the 3rd compartment and sat down to eat. Appendage brought a can of alcohol and poured us a mug of alcohol, 300 grams each. Then we diluted the alcohol and drank it. Soon Pridatko poured us two more mugs. While drinking, Pridatko gave me a pack of cigarettes, then took out a second pack and began to treat us. I, as well as the mechanic Uvarov, noticed to Pridatko that smoking was not allowed on the boat, to which Pridatko stated: “Who is the boss here? Since I allow it, smoke.” The mechanic then ventilated the boat.

Pridatko lit matches and gave us a light. I, Pridatko, Dorenko and the paramedic smoked. The drinking went on for about four hours, Pridatko got drunk to the point of insensibility.”

On December 3, 1944, on a submerged ship, as a result of a short circuit due to an insulation failure, a fire broke out in the battery compartment, which could have led to the death of the ship, only due to the fact that the fire was quickly detected and extinguished, the death of the ship was prevented. During the investigation of this fact, it was established that the insulation failure occurred as a result of the fact that the battery batteries were poorly secured, were loose, and the insulating rubber elbow touched the battery body. Pridatko, as a commander, knowing about this, did not take measures to eliminate it. The fire was also caused by a systematic leak of diesel fuel from the pipelines in the area of ​​the 3rd compartment. To eliminate the leak, 144 square meters were required. cm plantar skin. Moreover, despite repeated requests from the boat’s electricians, no measures were taken to eliminate this serious malfunction for a year. They went to sea with a faulty pipeline system, hanging a can of canned meat in the place where the diesel fuel leaked. Pridatko hid the incident of the fire from the command and did not submit an emergency report about the emergency.

During the investigation on this issue, Pridatko testified: “I did not submit an extraordinary report, so as not to show on the boat and the division an extra case of an emergency.”

Regarding the issue of the fire, witness Panarin testified: “When the fire broke out, things began to be transferred from the 3rd compartment to us in the 4th, and we began to transfer them to the 5th compartment. The fire lasted for 10–15 minutes. There was a lot of smoke, especially in the central control room, and the smoke spread to other compartments. After extinguishing the fire, they surfaced and ventilated the submarine. I personally know that diesel fuel was leaking from the solar line and the 3rd compartment, and a tin can of canned meat was placed under the drops of diesel fuel, approximately in the area of ​​the 33rd frame, i.e. in the immediate vicinity of the battery.”

Before Pridatko took command of the ship, Shch-319 was one of the best in the division. During his command, Pridatko ruined the discipline and organization of service on the ship, drank drunk, violated disciplinary practices, and used the ship's personnel in a number of cases for personal purposes, putting personal interests above state ones.

Witness Patskov testified on this issue: “Pridatko placed personal affairs above official ones and many times removed the personnel from boat work and ordered them to carry firewood to the apartment and saw it. I personally repeatedly had to carry and cut firewood in Pridatko’s apartment. In addition, in the spring of 1944, Pridatko ordered me, Pechenitsyn, Klyuev, Morozov and others to dig a garden for him with uprooting. The personnel did not want to serve under the command of Pridatko and expressed a desire to decommission from Shch-319. Pridatko often drank on the ship, I remember an incident in October 1944 at plant No. 202. Pridatko invited Dalzavol workers into the 3rd compartment, they drank, got drunk to the point of insensibility, smoked, burned matches and became rowdy. By this Pridatko lost his authority among the personnel."

Needless to say, the commander of Shch-319 looks like an unlikable person. Any weak and poorly prepared ship commander is a huge shortcoming of his direct superiors. Of course, after all, expensive equipment and military weapons fall into the hands of a random person, the fate of dozens of people depends on it! In such a situation, which developed by the spring of 1945 on the Shch-319, something had to happen, and it did.

From the book Technology and Weapons 1995 03-04 author

RED Banner SUBMARINE "S-13" (submarine type "S" (ix-BIS S.) 31 units of submarines of this series were manufactured. S-13 was laid down on November 19, 1938. Launched on April 25, 1939. Included in the Baltic Fleet entered on July 31, 1941. During the Great Patriotic War, submarine crews completed 4

From the book Equipment and Weapons 1997 04 author Magazine "Equipment and Weapons"

“Amur” is a fourth generation submarine. Recently, in a number of foreign countries, interest in diesel-electric submarines has revived, which combine a relatively low cost (an order of magnitude less than the cost of nuclear submarines) with high combat performance.

From the book Equipment and Weapons 2003 11 author Magazine "Equipment and Weapons"

From the book Equipment and Weapons 2003 12 author Magazine "Equipment and Weapons"

From the book Equipment and Weapons 2004 04 author Magazine "Equipment and Weapons"

From the book Weapons of Victory author Military affairs Team of authors --

Submarine "L" type (II series) The design bureau, headed by B. Malinin, began designing underwater minelayers of the "L" type II series immediately after the completion of the main work on the "D" type boats. Taking the "D" type submarine as a basis ", the designers replaced

From the book Submarines and Mine Boats of the Southerners, 1861–1865 author Ivanov S.V.

Submarine of the "Shch" type. The submarines of the "Shch" type envisaged by the first shipbuilding program - after the name of the lead boat "pike" - were intended for operations in coastal and inland seas and were to be armed with torpedoes of 533 mm caliber and

From the book Submarines of the XII series author Ignatiev E. P.

Submarine "New Orleans" At the end of June 1861, a woman from Buffalo, PC. New York, wrote about rumors that spoke of the construction of a submarine ship in the vicinity of the fool. By date, this submarine was built earlier than the underwater muscle cruiser “Pioneer” designed by an enthusiast

From the book Tragedies of the Soviet Submarine author Shigin Vladimir Vilenovich

The first submarine, Villery, was discovered by police on May 16, 1861, on the Delaware River on the outskirts of Philadelphia. The sheriff arrested the ship, establishing that it was built by an entrepreneur of French nationality, a certain Brutus de Villery. The boat was inspected by technical

From the book Drang nach Osten. Pressure to the East author Luzan Nikolay Nikolaevich

Cheeney's Submarine in Richmond, N.C. Virginia, Confederate Navy Department employee William Cheeney developed a design for a submarine, which was built at the Tridiger Ironworks plant in Richmond. In October 1861, the submarine was tested at James's

From the book Heroes of the Black Sea Submarine author Boyko Vladimir Nikolaevich

From the author's book

The Shch-139 submarine and its crew By the mid-30s of the 20th century, the Soviet Union made every effort to create a modern Navy capable of reliably covering the sea and ocean borders of the state. Lack of funds and unpreparedness of domestic industry

From the author's book

“Submarine in the steppes of Ukraine” The failure of Operation Clear Field in South Ossetia and the panicky flight of Georgian troops from the occupied part of Abkhazia - the upper part of the Kodori Gorge - and the subsequent recognition (August 2008) by Russia of the independence of these southern

From the author's book

Submarine Kesaev Astan Nikolaevich Submarine M-117 Submarine type "M" XII series was laid down under slipway number 287 at plant No. 112 (Krasnoye Sormovo) in Gorky on January 29, 1940. On February 12, 1941, the submarine was launched. In June 1941, the M-117 was loaded onto

From the author's book

Submarine of Alexander Sergeevich Morukhov Submarine M-35The type “M” submarine of the XII series was laid down on February 22, 1939 at plant No. 112 (Krasnoe Sormovo) in Gorky under serial number 269. The submarine was completed at plant No. 198 in Nikolaev. August 20

From the author's book

Submarine Pustovoitenko Nikolai Kupriyanovich Submarine M-32 Submarine type "M" XII series was laid down on August 31, 1938 at plant No. 112 (Krasnoe Sormovo) in Gorky under slipway number 259. In February 1940, the submarine was loaded on railway

The last voyage of the Black Sea Fleet submarine "Shch-211" is another unknown page of the Great Patriotic War.

Unusual find

In August 2001, the fourth historical and ethnographic expedition “Walking across Three Seas” started in Sevastopol from the Grafskaya pier, conducted with the support of the Russian Navy, the government of the Russian capital and the international organization UNESCO. Its participants were seven schoolchildren from Moscow and Sevastopol, who won this honorary right based on the results of the scientific conference “Archipelago Expeditions of the Russian Fleet”.

On the yacht "Perseus" young travelers passed through the places of military glory of the Russian fleet through the Black, Marmara and Aegean seas. In Bulgaria, they learned with interest that last fall, about 8 miles from Varna, in the area of ​​​​Cape Galata, at a depth of about 20 meters, local fishermen discovered a submarine from the Second World War, presumably Soviet. The Bulgarian side was in no hurry to officially report the find for two good reasons. Firstly, doubts remained about the identity of the submarine lying on the seabed, and secondly, it was in this area of ​​the Black Sea in 1941 - 1942. several submarines of the Black Sea Fleet were lost at once, so the possibility of re-discovery of the already known “unit” was not excluded.

Returning to their native Sevastopol, the guys immediately reported the unusual find of the Bulgarian fishermen to the command of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Soon a corresponding request was sent to the General Headquarters of the Bulgarian Navy. The answer did not come immediately: in order to say something concrete about the submarine lying at the bottom, not only its external inspection with the help of divers was required, but also serious work with archival documents.

For this purpose, retired captain III rank Rosen Gevshekov, who served as a senior diving officer at the Bulgarian Navy naval base in Varna, organized a team of scuba divers, which included members of the local diving club "Relict - 2002". As a result of several dives, it was established that at the bottom in the indicated area there really was a Soviet submarine from the Great Patriotic War of the "Shch" type, similar to the submarine "Shch-204", discovered in 1983 20 miles from Varna and examined by Bulgarian and Soviet specialists for a possible rise.

After the underwater stage of research on the as-yet unnamed “Pike,” Gevshekov began archival searches that were supposed to answer the main question: what number could she have worn? Active correspondence with the St. Petersburg Naval Museum, work with documents from the Varna Museum and still living witnesses of those distant events led to the expected result. Now, with a greater degree of probability, it could be argued that the fishing find was the submarine "Shch-211", which in November 1941 set out on its next military campaign, from which it was never destined to return to its home base...

Lucky "PIKE"

Laid down on September 3, 1934 in Nikolaev at the N200 plant (named after the 61st communard), "Shch-211", which had serial number 1035, was launched exactly 2 years later, and on May 5, 1938 it became part of the Black Sea Fleet.

By the beginning of the war, the Soviet Union had quite powerful submarine forces in the Black Sea. All Black Sea submarines were consolidated into two brigades consisting of 44 ships of six types, mostly Soviet-built. Only five boats of type "A" (previously called "AG" - "American Holland") were inherited by the fleet from the Russian Imperial Navy. The first brigade of submarines, commanded by Captain 1st Rank P. Boltunov, consisted of four divisions and numbered 22 boats. "Shch-211" was part of the 4th division under the command of captain III rank B. Uspensky, along with the submarines "Shch-212", "Shch-213", "Shch-214" and "Shch-215". It was the “Pikes” that were the main type of medium-tonnage boats of the Soviet Navy (V-bis, V-bis-2, X, and X-bis series)...

The submarine of the Black Sea Fleet "Shch-211" could rightfully be called lucky. On August 15, 1941, it was her crew under the command of Lieutenant Commander Alexander Devyatko who opened the combat account of the Black Sea submariners by sinking the large enemy transport Peles, which was sailing from the Bulgarian Burgas to the Romanian port of Constanta with military cargo on board. In the next 3 months of the war, the Shch-211, which regularly hunted enemy convoys off the coast of Bulgaria, came under powerful attacks three times from Bulgarian, Romanian and German escort aircraft, during one of which 12 depth charges were dropped on it. However, in an incomprehensible way, the “Pike” always managed to escape unharmed from heavy enemy fire, successfully avoiding mine traps and simultaneously achieving new combat successes.

On September 29, during the transition from Varna to Burgas, the Italian tanker Superga loaded with oil sank to the bottom from her torpedo; on November 14, the Romanian minelayer Prince Carol, heading for Varna, with under-equipped mines on board. On the same day, sea fortune turned away from its favorite submariners for the only and last time...

Submarine warfare

Then senior lieutenant Alexander Devyatko took command of the Shch-211 submarine in Sevastopol on the first day of the war - June 22, 1941. By that time, the enemy had already established an uninterrupted supply of its troops by sea. In this Germany was actively helped by monarchical Bulgaria. Legally being a non-combatant ally of the “Third Reich,” it nevertheless took a direct part in the hostilities against the Soviet Black Sea Fleet. The Bulgarian Air Force's "Sborno Troyvovo Yato" (squadron, soon expanded to a "bracket" - regiment) provided anti-submarine defense for the naval convoys of Germany and its allied countries, receiving combat missions from the representative of the German "Kriegsmarine" in Varna.

The position taken by Bulgaria, naturally, could not help but irritate the Soviet leadership. A real undeclared war was launched against the German satellite. As a result, in Bulgarian territorial waters, Black Sea Fleet submarines were actively used not only to fight enemy convoys and lay mines, but also to secretly land groups of Bulgarian underground fighters on Bulgarian territory to organize partisan movements and sabotage actions deep behind enemy lines.

On August 11, Alexander Devyatko’s crew successfully completed one of these risky missions. In stormy conditions and pitch darkness, at every minute the risk of being blown up by mines, with which the enemy generously littered all approaches to the Bulgarian shores, "Shch-211" landed a group of 14 Bulgarian communists under the command of Colonel Tsvyatko Radoinov at the mouth of the Kamchia River. In total, in August - September 1941, 7 such landing forces were sent to Bulgaria, trained at the Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Red Army (today's GRU). Just four days later, the Shch-211, by destroying the enemy transport Peles, opens the combat account of the Black Sea submariners. This date can be considered the beginning of active submarine warfare in the Black Sea. During the first five months of hostilities, the Black Sea forces in total destroyed 3 submarines, 2 monitors, 20 auxiliary ships and 7 enemy transports. The total tonnage of enemy losses amounted to more than 41 thousand tons. In total, until the end of 1941, Black Sea Fleet submarines made 103 combat missions. Among the destroyed ships were 2 of the 5 large Italian tankers owned by the Nazis. For this reason, Germany and Italy experienced serious interruptions in oil supplies from Romania for a long time. As already mentioned, one of these tankers, the Superga, is in service with the Shch-211.

However, victories at sea came at too high a price for the Black Sea Fleet. Submarines leaving for combat missions perished along with their crews one after another, mostly by being blown up by mines off the Bulgarian and Romanian coasts: "Shch-206", "M-58", "M-34", "M-59", "S-34". On November 14, 1941, “Shch-211” was added to this mournful list, in December - “Shch-204”. In total, about 300 trained submariners died in the first 5 months of the war alone. They tried to make up for the losses by urgently commissioning unfinished submarines evacuated from Nikolaev, the crews for which were formed on the fly from among undertrained sailors from surface ships. In addition, as a result of Stalin’s repressions, which mercilessly drove out truly experienced submarine commanders from the naval ranks, very young officers began to be appointed to command positions, and some of them, by a strong-willed decision of the higher headquarters, were sent to ships from the army and even... from cavalry units. Of course, all this did not have the best effect on the quality of training of submarine crews. By and large, in the initial period of the war, the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet did not have a single plan for the actions of its submarine forces. For some reason, the naval command was confident that the Romanian Navy was actively being strengthened by German submarines and their attack on our bases was a matter of the very near future. As a result, most Soviet submarines waited for the enemy at their bases, regularly observing the only Romanian submarine that did not take any action. The same boats that were heading to enemy shores regularly attacked the same mine “rake” - reconnaissance of the designated positions was not carried out. The vaults of the Central Naval Archive contain the devastating directive of the People's Commissar of the Navy, Admiral Nikolai Kuznetsov, regarding the Black Sea Fleet Military Council "On the results of the submarine war for 6 months of 1941." For a more complete understanding of the difficult situation in which the Black Sea submariners had to operate, this eloquent document is worth quoting in full.

“The results of the submarine war of the Black Sea Fleet for 6 months of the war show absolutely unsatisfactory results and your failure to comply with my orders regarding the use of submarines. Of the total number of 44 submarines of the Black Sea Fleet at the beginning of the war and 54 by the end of the period, 7 enemy transports were sunk in six months, at the same time 7 were killed of our submarines. Thus, each transport costs us the price of one boat.

For comparison, I inform you that the Northern Fleet, having 15 submarines at the beginning of the war and 21 boats at the end of the period, sank 48 enemy transports without losing a single boat. Conditions in the North are different from the Black Sea, but no less complex and difficult.

Reasons for the failure of submarine warfare on enemy communications: 1. Weak submarine tension. Only 5-6 submarines were deployed on enemy communications from the Bosporus to Odessa. On November 18, you were ordered to increase the number of positions to 14. Instead, the number of positions was reduced to 3.

2. Aimless use of submarines for purposes other than their intended purpose, such as shelling Yalta with one cannon, which I forbade you to do. Now a landing party of 20 people from a submarine has been landed in Koktebel, which could have been successfully done by a Defense Ministry boat.

3. Aimless patrol of submarines in front of Poti, where during 6 months of the war not a single enemy ship or submarine appeared, which I also pointed out to you. 4. Poor work of the Black Sea Fleet headquarters in terms of planning and organizing submarine operations, without analyzing the situation, without helping submarines in ensuring the solution of their main task. There is no reconnaissance of the positions themselves. It is obvious that "Shch-204", "Shch-211", "S-34" were killed, and "Shch-205" and "L-4" were blown up at position N28, and yet the submarines continued to be sent one after another and to On December 24, Shch-207 was sent there.

I expect the implementation of my orders on the use of submarines and the report that you made as a result of analyzing the experience of the first six months of the war in order to reduce the losses of your submarines and increase the impact on enemy communications. KUZNETSOV".

The corresponding conclusions from the document were drawn, but they could no longer stop the continuing increase in combat losses: in total, more than half of the submarines of the Black Sea Fleet were lost during the war years.

At the same time, the obvious miscalculations of the naval command did not in any way detract from the true heroism of the submarine crews, who alone entered into an unequal battle with the ships and aircraft guarding enemy convoys. The submariners understood that each torpedo strike that reached the target inexorably brought the long-awaited Victory Day closer, on the altar of which they selflessly sacrificed their lives...

The mystery of the death of "Shch-211"

Extensive research work carried out by Bulgarian enthusiasts made it possible to reconstruct in detail the chronicle of the events of the last day of the lost "Pike". On November 14, 1941, the Shch-211, which was in a combat position, took bearings off Cape Galata of the Romanian minelayer Prince Carol, which was heading for Varna. However, the first torpedo attack by our submariners turns out to be unsuccessful. Taking advantage of the pause, the commander of the Romanian ship reports an attack on a German military airfield located in the area of ​​Lake Varna. The second torpedo salvo of the "Pike" reaches its target: the "Prince Carol" goes to the bottom 5 miles from Varna. Having convinced himself that the enemy ship has been defeated, the commander of "Shch-211" gives the command to surface. On the surface and at maximum speed, the submarine begins to move away in a south-easterly direction. However, 3 miles from the sinking site of the Prince Carol, the Pike is overtaken by a German plane. Having received severe damage to the hull from bombs dropped on it, the submarine sinks. The next day, storm waves will wash ashore near the village of Shkorpilovtsy with terrible evidence of the death of the Soviet submarine: the disfigured body of the senior assistant commander, a torn landing boat and a dented tank with fuel. It is interesting that the sequence of events outlined by the Bulgarians on that distant tragic day has nothing in common with the official version of the death of Shch-211. According to Soviet data, the "Pike" of Lieutenant Commander Devyatko was blown up by a mine in the area of ​​Cape Shabler on November 16, 1941, that is, two days later.

The discrepancy in dates cannot but surprise. Some Soviet sources even claim that “Shch-211” “went out on another combat mission on November 16, did not make contact and did not return to base at the appointed time. Presumably it was blown up by a mine and died in the Varna area.” But if we take into account that the Pike left Sevastopol only on November 16, then it could not have appeared in the Varna area on the same day: the submarine’s passage would have taken much longer. Most likely, the date of the death of Shch-211 is approximate, because the Soviet side did not have any specific evidence indicating either the exact day of the tragedy or its actual causes. Meanwhile, German pilots clearly recorded on November 14 the fact of the sinking of a Soviet submarine as a result of the bombing. Despite the fact that domestic military historians are still skeptical about the effectiveness of the use of German depth charges by aviation against submarines and claim that not a single one of the Black Sea Fleet submarines was destroyed from the air in 1941, the Bulgarian version of the death of Shch-211 seems more plausible. The lens of an underwater video camera captured numerous damage to the submarine’s hull, which a mine alone could not cause. In addition, the above-mentioned directive of the People's Commissar of the Navy speaks in favor of the Bulgarian version. Admiral Kuznetsov clearly distinguishes between the concepts of “died” and “exploded.” The latter does not apply to Shch-211.

Under state protection

The further fate of the found "Pike" is the topic of future consultations and meetings of Russian and Bulgarian representatives. As a rule, any actions regarding sunken and lost ships are carried out in accordance with intergovernmental agreements. According to the Law of the Russian Federation “On perpetuating the memory of those killed in defense of the Fatherland,” adopted in 1993, the sites where warships and their crews were lost are military graves, are subject to state registration and are protected by the state. Their maintenance on the territory of other states is carried out in the manner determined by interstate treaties and agreements.

Lifting the Shch-211, due to severe damage to the hull, can hardly be considered advisable. Despite the fact that the bow torpedo tubes are most likely empty (the Romanian ship was attacked twice), there is still a danger of an explosion of the spare torpedoes located on the racks and in the stern tubes of the submarine. Most likely, in relation to the Shch-211, the scheme already worked out in June 1983 by the Search and Rescue Directorate of the Black Sea Fleet for inspecting the Shch-204 submarine, which perished on December 6, 1941, also off the coast of Bulgaria, will be applied. Then the 28th Scientific Research Institute of the Ministry of Defense concluded that it was unsafe to raise the submarine due to the dubious state of the torpedo combat charging compartments. Preparations for the planned rise of the "Pike" were stopped. The submarine's hull was cleared of fragments of nets and fouling, the upper deckhouse hatch was opened, and after examining the central post and compartments, the remains of the submariners and part of the ship's documentation were raised to the surface. At the end of the work, which was carried out for 45 days, the upper conning hatch was welded shut, and the remains of the crew members were buried in Sevastopol. The bow gun from the submarine is now one of the most valuable exhibits of the Museum of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation.

Point of memory and sorrow

On nautical charts there is a point with coordinates 42 53 min. 8 sec. north latitude and 28 03 min. 6 sec. eastern longitude is the place where military honors are given in memory of the crews of the submarines "Shch-204", "S-34", "Shch-211" and others who died while operating on enemy communications in the western part of the Black Sea during the Great Patriotic War.

In Bulgaria itself, the memory of Shch-211 is honored in a special way. One of the streets in Varna is named after Alexander Devyatko, and for a long time the Bulgarian side annually invited the families of the deceased submariners to its world-famous Golden Sands resort. If the remains of the dead crew are removed from the hull of the Shchuka, which has become an underwater necropolis, Sevastopol will honor its heroes. Through the grinding of enemy mines and the echoing explosions of depth charges, they rushed to their home base to report a new victory for the Black Sea people. Today, when more than half a century separates us from the war, their failed return to their native shores must finally take place.

Currently, we can name many who died during the Second World War for unknown reasons. It can be assumed with a high degree of probability that most of them ended up on the seabed not without enemy influence. Others ended their military careers due to shipwrecks. Still others may have been mistakenly destroyed by their own - such cases were not very rare. Perhaps the same fate befell submarine Black Sea Fleet "Shch-206", which died in the first combat campaign.

"Pike" - shortened title for six episodes diesel-electric submarines USSR Navy. Built according to designs by B.M. Malinina. The design of the third series of submarines was taken as a basis, which was distinguished by its simplicity of design, reliability, and the ability to be transported by rail in disassembled form.

Diesel-electric torpedo Submarine series V-bis-2 code “Pike”, tail number “Shch-206”. Until 1934 it was called " Nelma" The Soviet "Shch-206" was laid down on January 5, 1934 at plant No. 200 "Name of 61 Communards" in the city of Nikolaev, and launched on February 1, 1935. On October 1, 1936, it became part of the USSR Black Sea Fleet.

diesel-electric torpedo submarine series

V-bis-2 code “Pike” photo

Soviet submarine "Shch-206" in the Southern Bay, the city of Sevastopol

On the day the Great Patriotic War began Submarine"Shch-206" went on a military campaign to the Romanian shores. The commander of the submarine, Lieutenant Commander S.A. Karakai, received orders to attack Romanian ships if they left the main base of the enemy fleet - Constanta. To the database submarine"Shch-206" did not return, thereby opening the list of losses of submarines of the Black Sea Fleet.

The main version appeared soon sinking of a submarine"Shch-206", according to which the submarine exploded on a Romanian minefield. By the way, this version is considered generally accepted today. True, it later became clear that the boundaries of the position submarine"Shch-206" did not include the area of ​​​​Constanza itself, since the Romanians announced the laying of mines there long before the start of the war. Perhaps the Shch-206 submarine ended up on a minefield as a result of an unfortunate navigation error.

According to another version, Soviet submarine"Shch-206" was sunk on July 9 by Romanian warships. On this day, the Romanians decided to start trawling the fairway south of the main base of their fleet - where the position of the Soviet submarine was located. Having discovered the periscope, the Romanian ships began to pursue the unidentified submarine. Later, torpedo boats approached the scene and attacked the submarine with depth charges. The chase ended with a powerful underwater explosion and the formation of an oil slick on the surface of the water.

However, even in this case it is impossible to declare with complete confidence the victory of enemy ships over submarine"Shch-206", since a strong underwater explosion could be mistaken for a series of explosions of depth charges themselves, and the sailors saw periscopes and oil stains quite often.

Unfortunately, in the initial period of the war, the Soviet armed forces acted inconsistently. The Black Sea Fleet was no exception. Perhaps the lack of coordination between the commanders of ships and formations on the one hand, and senior management on the other, was the reason submarine deaths"Shch-206"?

The next day after Soviet submarine"Shch-206" left the base for the last time; a dispatch was received from the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command to the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet, according to which the surface ships were to conduct a raid operation on Constanta. The purpose of the raid was the destruction of an oil storage facility and reconnaissance of the defense of the Romanian naval base. On the evening of June 25, a detachment of light forces consisting of the cruiser Voroshilov, the leaders of the destroyers Moskva and Kharkov, as well as the destroyers Soobrazitelny and Smyshleny, left the port of Sevastopol to bombard the enemy coast. However, the commander of the operation, T. A. Novikov, was not informed of the presence of the Soviet submarine Shch-206 off the Romanian coast. Naturally, the commander could not know anything about the operation diesel submarine.

The next morning, a detachment of the Black Sea Fleet appeared in the Constanta area. Soon an artillery duel with enemy coastal batteries began. The duel was not in favor of Novikov’s squadron, since coastal targets were clearly visible, and the silhouettes of Soviet ships were clearly visible. A few minutes after opening fire, the destroyer Moskva exploded and sank - the ship was maneuvering in an enemy minefield. As a result, the detachment of ships was forced to leave the dangerous area.

True, the evil fate of the ships of the light forces detachment did not end there. When the squadron was leaving, a torpedo trail was discovered on the left side of the destroyer Soobrazitelny. " Savvy", in turn, fired several depth charges at the supposed location of the submarine. During underwater explosions, the stern of the submarine appeared from the water, followed by characteristic signs of its death - air bubbles and oil stains.

Black Sea sailors suggested that the destroyed by the destroyer " Savvy"The submarine was the only Romanian submarine « Dolphin", but the latter was far from the scene of events and subsequently survived the war. Name and affiliation of the sunken submarines remained unclear.

This circumstance served as the basis for the assumption that the attacked submarine was Soviet submarine"Shch-206". At a much later time, this version had numerous supporters. They also explain the death of the destroyer " Moscow"commander's mistake submarine"Shch-206", which, not being aware of the ongoing raid mission, mistook its ships for Romanian ones.

However, to this day there is no clear evidence that adherents of this point of view are right. Probably, the traces of torpedoes and signs of the death of an unknown submarine were once again nothing more than a figment of the sailors’ imagination, and the real reason sinking of a submarine“Shch-206” remained a secret. We just have to believe that it won’t be forever.

During the Second World War, class " Pike» actively participated in combat operations at sea. For military services, six of them became guardsmen, eleven were awarded the Order of the Red Banner.

Technical characteristics of the submarine "Pike":

Length - 58.8 m,
Width - 6.2 m;
Draft - 4.3 m;
Surface displacement 609 tons
Underwater displacement - 706 tons;
Immersion depth - up to 90 m;
Power plant - two diesel engines of 685 hp each. and two electric motors of 400 hp each;
Speed ​​- 10 knots;
Cruising range - 9300 miles surfaced and 100 miles submerged;
Crew - 40 people;
Armament:
Torpedo tubes 533 mm - 4 bow and 2 stern (10 torpedoes);
45 mm gun (some have 37 mm automatic guns) - 2;