home · Efficiency · WorldSkills Russia: how it works for us. What is WorldSkills? How should expert groups evaluate the work of participants?

WorldSkills Russia: how it works for us. What is WorldSkills? How should expert groups evaluate the work of participants?

FINAL TEST

Onexpert of the demo exam according to WorldSkills Russia standards

    ? What are the challenges facing the eSIM End-to-End Monitoring System?

Select some options

    Checking championships for compliance with WorldSkills standards

    What is competence in terms of WorldSkills Russia?

Choose the right option

    This is the level of professional skills of the competitor

    This is a set of knowledge and skills in a specific professional field

    This is the name of the championship site

2.What are the objectives of the demonstration exam according to WorldSkills standards?

Choose the right option

    Assessment of practical skills and abilities of students and graduates of educational organizations

    Determining the level of theoretical knowledge of students and graduates

    Improving the professional level of teachers

3.What opportunities arise as a result of the introduction of the Demonstration Exam into the state final certification?

Select some options

    Comparison of results with the global level of competencies

    Determining growth points for secondary vocational education

    Priority in participation in regional championships for exam participants

4.What is the “Hi-Tech Championship”?

Choose the right option

    Championship for specialists working at Russian enterprises

    Championship for specialists working at leading global enterprises

    Russian final for graduates of professional educational institutions of Russia

5.In what information system are the evaluation criteria entered?

Choose the right option

    eSim

    CIS

    Register of championship participants

6.What are "EuroSkills"?

Choose the right option

    European Championship according to WorldSkills standards

    World Championship, which is held in European countries

    Professions most popular in European countries

7.What guarantees compliance with the principle of fairness during the championship?

Choose the right option

    Development of documentation by an independent organization

    Involvement of independent experts in judging

    Compliance with championship standards

8.What technologies may the Technical Description of Competence contain?

Choose the right option

    Relevant at the moment and which may appear in the near future (Future Skills)

    Current and obsolete

    Only relevant ones

9. Which document sets out the general rules that apply to all WorldSkills competitions?

Choose the right option

    Championship Regulations (Rules)

    Code of Ethics

10. What such Skill Management Plan (S MR )?

Choose the right option

    Work plan at the competency site

    Site development plan

    Competitors Skill Development Plan

11.What is indicated in the Site Development Plan?

Select some options

    Layout of competition sites

    List of instruments that a participant can bring with them

12.What should be indicated in the Infrastructure List?

Choose the right option

    Location of infrastructure on site (sockets, compressed air outlets, water, etc.)

    List of all necessary equipment, tools, consumables, office equipment and supplies required for the operation of the site, provided by the organizer

    Parameters such as illumination, voltage, pressure, etc.

13. How many hours are usually allocated to complete a competition task?

Choose the right option

    from 3 to 15

    from 15 to 22

14.If the Test Project is published in advance, then...

Choose the right option

    30% changes must be made to it

    its publication must be communicated to all site experts in advance

    all experts must be familiar with it at least a week before the championship

15.Which document establishes the “framework of competence”?

Choose the right option

    Technical description of the competency

    Test task

    Championship regulations

? 16.Who develops the test item for the demonstration exam?

Choose the right option

    National expert together with main regional experts

    Competency manager together with certified experts

    Main regional experts together with the RCC

17.What is the elementary position of the Evaluation Criteria?

Choose the right option

    Criterion

    Subcriterion

    Aspect

18.What number of assessment aspects is considered optimal for assessing the skill of a championship participant?

Choose the right option

    from 50 to 150

    from 75 to 250

    from 50 to 300

19.Which aspects have measurable parameters?

Choose the right option

    Objective

    Subjective

    Judicial

20. Judging aspects are assessed...

Choose the right option

    3rd by experts and on a scale of 0-1-2-3

    5 experts and on a scale of 0-1-2-3

    5 experts on a 10-point scale

21.How many modules can the Test Project include?

Choose the right option

    from 2 to 20

    from 3 to 9

    No restrictions on the number of modules

22What are the different aspects of assessment?

Select some options

    Are common

    Subjective

    Objective (or measurable)

    Judicial

23.What level of difficulty should the competition project have?

Choose the right option

    Comply with the professional level of the contestants of this championship

    Very high for a graduate

    Very high even for a professional

24.Which aspects are assessed first and which ones second?

Select some options

    First the subjective aspects, then the objective ones

    First the judging aspects, then the objective ones

    First objective, then subjective or judicial

? 25.Who must endorse the score sheets after the judging procedure?

Choose the right option

    All group experts and the main expert

    All group experts and compatriot expert

    All experts of the group that assessed the participant’s work

26.Who checks the marks in the handwritten mark sheets against the marks entered in the CIS in the demonstration exam?

Choose the right option

    Technical Expert

    Expert group 5.3 methods de

    Expert compatriot

27.How many experts should be in the group for assessing subjective aspects?

Choose the right option

    5

28.Who can be on the competition site?

Choose the right option

    Only persons whose admission to the site has been approved by the chief expert

    Only accredited experts who have been trained in the rules of judging

    Persons accredited on this site

29In what case does a team leader (team leader) have the right to communicate with a participant during the championship?

Choose the right option

    Only on the initiative of the participant and with the permission of the main expert

    At any time on your own initiative, but only with the permission of the chief expert

    Any time the team leader decides to do this

30Who can act as the chief examiner in the demonstration exam?

Select some options

    Experts who have been trained and have certificates of the right to evaluate the completion of demonstration exam tasks

    Experts who have been trained and have certificates of the right to conduct a corporate or regional championship

    Certified WorldSkills Expert

    Any expert who has previously taken part in the championship

31. At what stage is the appraisal sheet signed by experts?

Choose the right option

    At the end of the day C4

    Immediately after completion of the assessment procedure

    At the end of the demo exam

32. Conducting a draw for jobs...

Choose the right option

    Always required

    Mandatory if the jobs are not identical

    Conducted at the discretion of the chief expert

33.Who is a “compatriot expert”?

Choose the right option

    Participant Expert

    An expert admitted to judging his participant

    Expert with championship experience according to WS standards

34.What powers can the chief site expert grant to other experts during the demonstration exam?

Select some options

    Safety precautions and labor protection

    Communication with the press and visitors

    Entering grades into CIS

    Environmental protection

For an expert demonstration exam according to WorldSkills Russia standards

1 lesson 1 test

What activities are the core of the WS movement?

Professional skills training

Professional skills championships

Publishing educational literature on competencies

Which of the following standards are WS standards?

Standards for Materials and Equipment for WS Championships

WS competition documentation standards

WS Brand Personality Standards

What is included in the standards for holding championships?

Judging Rules

Functionality (procedures) of championship days

Requirements for participants and experts

What are hard skills?

Skills that are necessary to create a labor product

Skills that score the most

The skills that are most difficult to master

Lesson 3 2 test

What is competence in terms of WS Russia?

This is the level of professional skills of the competitor.

This is a set of knowledge and skills in a specific professional field

This is the name of the championship site

Which of the listed events have the characteristics of a “championship according to HRV standards”?

Corporate Championship

Demo exam

Qualifying round before the national championship

Who is a “compatriot expert”?

An expert representing the interests of his participant at the championship

Expert involved in judging

Expert performing at an international championship

In what areas should an expert be competent7

In the judging rules

In the competence that he represents

In the standards of preparation and holding of the championship

Lesson 4 3 test

How many blocks are all WS competencies divided into?

In which branch of championship events is the Russian national final located?

Enterprises

A Skills Passport is...

State diploma

A document confirming the level of competency according to WSR standards

Fill out sheet during demo exam

The tasks of a competency manager include...

Transfer of best practices and development of competence in the country

Growth of the expert community, both qualitative and quantitative

Responsible for results at international championships

Lesson 5 Test 4

The WS Standards Demonstration Exam is...

Skills Assessment Form

Improving the professional level of teachers

Determining the level of theoretical knowledge

The demonstration exam is conducted on assessment documents and assignments based on

Sets of assessment documentation for competencies

Worldskills Standards Specification (WSSS)

Methodology for organizing and conducting a demonstration exam according to Worldskills standards

The Worldskills Demonstration Examination Center is...

Worldskills Russia partner company with material and technical base

A platform for conducting a demonstration exam with material and technical equipment that meets the requirements of the Union

All vocational education institutions

Duration of execution of an intermediate set of tasks

From 2 to 8 hours

From 8 to 16 hours

From 8 to 14 hours

What is recorded in the Skills Passport?

Participant's personal data

Educational organization

Demo Exam Center

The best score in world practice for this competency

Profession, specialty

Lesson 7 5 test

Which of the following documents regulate what is happening in the competency during the championship?

Development plan

Infrastructure sheet

Test task

What two documents are required to complete the development of the competition site?

Infrastructure sheet

Development plan

In what cases is the Technical Description of the competency updated?

If you need to change a single test task

If new technologies appear

If the Infrastructure List has changed

Lesson 8 6 test

What knowledge and skills should a competitor have?

Examples of assessment criteria on the basis of which an assessment scheme is drawn up

Technical parameters of the competence area (lighting, floor load. Electrical parameters, etc.)

Which section is the most important in the Data Sheet?

Section No. 8 containing information about Toolbox

Section No. 2 containing WorldSkills Specification (W555)

Section No. 1, containing information about the profession

What information does the WorldSkills Standard Specification (W555) contain?

The set of knowledge and skills that a competitor must have

The importance of each group (section) of knowledge and skills

The number of points assigned for completing the competition task

When is the Technical Description of Competencies for Regional Championships updated?

Once a year at the Russian National Championship

Once a year at the HI-Tech Championship

Every two years at the International Championship

Lesson 9 7 Test

The competition task is...

A document or set of documents that describes tasks. standing in front of the contestant

The task(s) for all days of the championship, facing the competitor, which can be conveyed to him in any of the ways, orally or in writing

The task described in section 5 of the Technical Description and developed specifically for this competency of this championship

What level of difficulty should the Test Project have?

Very high for a graduate

Very high even for a professional

Corresponding to the level of competitors in this championship competency

How many hours are given to complete a competition task at championships according to WorldSkills Russia standards?

Anything agreed upon by the expert community

30% changes in the Test Project cannot...

simplify the test task

shorten the test task

radically different from the part of the Test Project they replace

10 lessons 8 test

The evaluation criteria are...

A set of aspects by which the competitor’s work is assessed

List in the WorldSkills Standard Specification section (knowledge and skills section)

CIS system download file

What is the minimum and maximum number of assessment aspects?

From 50 to 300

From 75 to 250

From 50 to 500

What are the aspects?

subjective

objective (or measurable)

judicial

The judging aspect is...

an aspect that can be accurately determined whether it has been fulfilled or not

aspect, the implementation of which is determined by the subjective opinion of experts of the assessment group

an aspect whose weight in points is determined by the opinion of the judges

On what scale are SUBJECTIVE aspects assessed?

Lesson 11 9 test

The infrastructure sheet is...

A document that reflects all the positions that will be provided to competitors at the championship site

a list of all necessary equipment, tools, supplies, office equipment and supplies

competition site development plan

“Toolbox” maybe...

Certain

universal

zero “toolbox” includes...

Any equipment that he considers necessary for the completion of the Test Project, excluding prohibited items

Specific items that the participant must bring with him to the championship

Lack of opportunity to bring anything to the championship site

The development plan is...

List of absolutely all positions that will be provided by the organizers at the championship site

Diagram showing items from the infrastructure sheet

Part in the technical description of the competency

Lesson 12 10 test

Opening ceremony of the competition

First day of competition

First day after the competition

On what day does the expert introduce the 30% change to the Test Project?

What happens on C-4 day?

Evening briefings of participants and experts

Conducting competitions

Entering grades into the CIS system

What is Skill Management Plan (SMP)

Work plan for the site of competence, which indicates the functionality of each for the work of the site

Site development plan

Competitors Skill Development Plan

Lesson 13 11 test

The two core values ​​of WS are...

Justice

Versatility

Relevance

What is relevance?

Compliance with modern professional trends

Direct connection to the real industry

Mandatory testing of theoretical knowledge

What documents regulate the rules for making decisions at the competition site?

Championship Regulations

Code of Ethics

Championship regulations

What documents do the championship regulations prevail over?

Code of Ethics

Technical description of the competency

Normative description of competence

Test task

Lesson 14 12 test

What are the judicial roles?

Chief Expert

Site technical expert

Tim is a leader

What powers can the chief expert of the site give to other experts at the championship?

Safety precautions and labor protection

Communication with the press and visitors

Entering grades into CIS

Environmental protection

In what cases can a compatriot expert be allowed to judge his participant?

Blind assessment

Consent of 70% of compatriot experts present on the site to allow an expert to evaluate their participant

By decision of the president (chairman) of the jury

Lesson 15 13 test

Which competition tasks have a STOP point?

Not in every competition task

Only in tasks at world championships

How many experts should be involved in assessing objective aspects?

What does “2” mean in a judge’s score?

Unsatisfactory

Work does not meet industry standards

The quality of work is at or above a high industrial level

What is the maximum score in the subjective assessment?

At what stage do you sign the scorecards with your signatures?

At the end of the day S-4

Immediately after completion of the assessment procedure

At the end of the championship

Lesson 16 14 test

Who can be on the competition site?

Participants

Technologists

All experts, except independent experts and compatriot experts

Can accredited media take photographs of a participant’s work from the site side?

Only with the permission of the chief expert

What should a participant do if difficulties arise in completing a competition task?

Contact a compatriot expert

Raise your hand to attract the attention of experts

Invite a chief expert

On the eve of WorldSkills Competition 2019: about how open source software has changed over 10 years

We are very proud to be involved in Russia’s entry into the international WorldSkills movement. Another important achievement was the victory for the right to host the WorldSkills Competition in Kazan in the summer of 2019. These events played a key role in the development of domestic secondary vocational education, changing approaches, educational programs and attitudes towards colleges throughout the country.

On the eve of the WSC-2019 Championship, we would like to once again remind you of the values ​​of worldskills, which are shared and promoted by hundreds of thousands of people around the world. It is the value content of the movement - self-realization, skills and competencies, professionalism and respect for work - that is the reliable foundation of the global WorldSkills expert community.

WorldSkills in the world

WorldSkills is an international social movement that unites people all over the world who want to change something. Its main mission is to create conditions for people who want professional self-realization.

There is a non-profit organization “WorldSkills International”, which performs the functions of the Olympic Committee: its task is to hold the World Championships every 2 years.

The mechanism of WorldSkills is the holding of competitions through which communities are formed and developed: through interaction between competition participants and experts, as well as communication between competitors on the competition platform. It is this effect that mainly brings changes to the system of secondary vocational education and advanced training in Russia. Expert communities are emerging. They produce the most valuable content—content for college education programs. Thanks to participation in WorldSkills, approaches to formation and the educational programs themselves in Russian colleges have changed radically over these 7 years.

WorldSkills Competition format

The WorldSkills world competition is, first of all, a unique, large-scale event with the participation of delegations from most countries on the planet! Hosting such an event is a great organizational task, honor and responsibility, not inferior to any other global competitions, finals of world championships and championships. It’s not for nothing that WSC is also called the Olympics of skills and competencies, comparing the WorldSkills movement with the Olympic one.

At the center of the world championship, of course, are competitions in the official competencies of the WS movement, selected according to the criterion of greatest popularity. Thus, the formation of a competitive agenda is a kind of rating of in-demand professions and tracking the dynamics of those competencies that are losing popularity under the onslaught of automation and new technologies.

An important part of the event is the congress and exhibition part, during which the global WorldSkills community, in discussions with representatives of government, business, local territories and industries, predict the development of certain skills and competencies.

Also, during the preparation for the WSC, the participating countries initiate a large number of social projects, which are considered during the two-year preparation period by the WSI Directorate, agreed upon by the WSI Board of Directors and finally approved at the current General Assembly as part of the program of the next championship. Some events, such as One School One Country, become traditional and are already included in the mandatory part of the World Competitions (WSC).

Preparation for the next World Championship begins at the current WSC. At the business part of the event, objectives for the movement and challenges in modern secondary vocational education (VET) are formulated, which form the agenda of the business part of the upcoming championship. This is the responsibility of the Official Delegates from each WSI member country, constituting the Strategic Committee. At the competitions themselves, WSI standards and tasks for the next championship are formed through the assembled expert communities. This is the task of the Technical Delegates from WSI Members and the WSI Technical Committee.

Principles of WorldSkills competitions (WorldSkills Standard)

To achieve maximum effect, the following competition conditions must be observed:

  • Competitions must be public, i.e. they can be freely visited by all interested parties,
  • Competition rules and conditions must be uniform and equal for all participants,
  • Test tasks and assessment criteria must be known in advance,
  • During the competition, all selected criteria must be evaluated. No less than 16 and no more than 22 hours of pure competitive time are allocated for this (practice has shown that this is the most optimal time for a reliable assessment of the competencies of participants),
  • The maximum possible number of specialists and experts should be involved in the process of assessing criteria,
  • The result evaluation system should be unbiased (preferably electronic) and based on primary information received from each expert.

In the so-called The WorldSkills standard includes regulatory documentation for competitions, namely: Technical Description (TD - Technical Description), Test Project (TP - Test Project), Evaluation Criteria, Infrastructure List, competition site plan with equipment (Layout) and Technical Requirements safety (Health & Safety).

WorldSkills competition experts

The role of experts in organizing competitions is very high. An expert is recognized as a person who has certain competencies: knowledge of his profession, knowledge of WS standards and regulations, knowledge of the competition procedure, participation in the preparation of a test task and in determining evaluation criteria.

Experts form expert communities. The Chief and Deputy Chief Expert are selected at the end of the current competition for the next Competition. Before this, all experts participating in the work at the current championship, immediately after its completion, formulate changes to the current standards and form preliminary Tasks for the next championship. Based on these documents, the newly elected Chief and Deputy Chief Expert for each profession, together with the Technical Directorate, change the regulations for the upcoming Competitions. After a year, they are joined by Technical Delegates, who are appointed by the Presidents of the Jury for the relevant competencies. From this moment on, the Skills Management Team is formed, which determines the exact regulations and tasks. Six months before the Competition, they gather together on the site as part of the Competition Preparation Week (CPW - Competition Preparation Week) and make final decisions on the venue, the readiness of the site, all the shortcomings of the site, etc. In the last six months, newly appointed experts from countries/regions who have expressed a desire to participate in the Competition in this competency.

At CPW, the list of competencies (professions) for which Competitions will be held is finally determined. If by this time a sufficient number of participants have not registered for a competency, then for the next Competition the competency is removed and one of the Presentation ones takes its place. There is a natural rotation and a kind of popularity ranking.

For a high-quality assessment, a minimum regulated number of experts is also required. The number of experts may exceed the number of participants. Often this is even welcomed, since it allows for higher objectivity of judging.

SMTs form a Skills Management Plan (SMP) - a breakdown of experts into groups, the order of judging, competition times and other detailed information for the upcoming Competitions.

Completed competition tasks are assessed in accordance with the scoring rules adopted by WSR based on the requirements for competence (profession) determined by the Technical Description. All scores and grades are recorded in the Automated Scoring System (CIS).

15.1.2. Aspects of the sub-criteria

Each criterion is divided into one or more Sub-criteria. Each Sub-Criterion is subdivided into several Sub-Criterion Aspects for which points are awarded. Aspects of assessment can be either subjective or objective.

15.1.3. Number of aspects

The number of Assessment Aspects should be from 50 to 300 pcs. The optimal amount is between 75 and 200 aspects.

If the number of Aspects in any specialty exceeds 300, then the Organizing Committee of the Championship must confirm to the Technical Director of the Union that the Jury will be able to complete the evaluation process without haste within the allotted time.

15.1.4. Maximum objectivity of assessment

The Championship must strive to maximize the objectivity of the assessment.

15.1.5. Rationale and scoring system

Test Projects evaluate only the skills and knowledge specified in the Technical Description. Within each competency, Experts evaluate completed competitive tasks in accordance with the Evaluation Criteria agreed upon with the National Expert.


    1. Evaluation of subjective indicators

      1. Regulations for the use of fan signs
The subjective evaluation of each Aspect is carried out by five Experts. Each Expert assigns points from 1 to 10, which are indicated on the plates. Placards must be used correctly: Experts must select the correct rating plate themselves, after which all Experts simultaneously raise and display the plaques at the command of the group leader.

When assessing subjectively on a 10-point scale, the following scoring principles apply:

1-4: below industry standard to average;

5-8: at or above industry standard;

9-10: Brilliant or outstanding work.

A handwritten score sheet printed from CIS (original) is used to record the final scores. Once the handwritten score sheets are completed, the grades entered are entered into the CIS. Once the scores are entered into the CIS, the Entry Assessor must print out the completed score sheets for each competitor and submit them to the Competitor Assessor for review and comparison with the completed handwritten forms. After checking, the Compatible Expert signs all sheets of both versions of the assessment forms and hands them over to the Chief Expert. The main expert, after signing by the compatriot expert, transfers the paper forms of evaluation sheets to the Organizing Committee. The Organizing Committee stores these paper forms for at least 2 weeks after the end of the Championship as a control document.


      1. Calculation of the awarded point
Each Expert assigns a point from 1 to 10 for each Aspect of the Sub-Criterion. These scores cannot differ by more than 3. Once this requirement is met, the scores are entered into the CIS and the CIS removes the highest score (or one of them if there is more than one) and the lowest score (or one of them if there is more than one) ) from those accrued. The average of the three remaining scores is divided by 10 and multiplied by the maximum score for that Aspect to obtain the score that will be awarded to the competitor ultimately.

If the competitor has not fulfilled any Aspect of the Sub-Criterion, he will receive zero points from the Experts. This result is entered into the CIS by marking it as “Non-attempt”.


      1. Using Scorecards
For each criterion in the Technical Description, the Jury will describe and enter on the Subjective Score Sheet the details of the Sub-Criterion and the Aspect of the Sub-Criterion being scored, together with the maximum score for each Aspect of the Sub-Criterion. To register the awarded points, the corresponding Subjective Indicators Assessment Sheet is used.

    1. Evaluation of objective indicators

      1. Process
Each Sub-Criterion and its Aspects are assessed by three Experts.

      1. Using Forms
For each Technical Description Criterion, the Jury will describe and enter into the Objective Evaluation Forms a description of the Sub-Criterion and Aspects of the Sub-Criterion being assessed, along with the maximum score for each Aspect. The appropriate Objective Indicator Assessment Form is used to record the points awarded.

When collective score sheets containing several names of competitors are used, a master form is also created in which all scores from each individual Expert form are entered for entering the data into the CIS. This form is then stored as a control document.


    1. Evaluation process

      1. Beginning of the Championship
Before the Championship Information Support System is ready for the start of the Championship, the Chief Expert must notify CIS specialists that all preparatory tasks have been completed and the criteria have been selected.

      1. Evaluation of subjective indicators occurs before evaluation of objective indicators
When both subjective and objective measures are assessed, the subjective score is given first. Marks entered by hand on the statements are entered there in ink.

      1. Assessment Groups
Experts from the Jury are organized in such a way that an objective assessment of each Aspect of the Sub-criterion is carried out by 3 Experts, and a subjective assessment by 5 Experts. Each assessment team should assess the same aspects of the Sub-Criterion for each competitor to ensure standardization of assessment. For equal scoring, each group should score the same number of marks whenever possible.

      1. Experts and evaluation of competitors from their region.
Experts do not evaluate contestants from their region. However, this creates difficulties in the objectivity of grading. Objectivity can be achieved by having the same group of Experts evaluate each competitor on each of the aspects for which they award points. This problem can be solved in several ways:

  • During the assessment, an additional Expert joins the group of Experts and gives an assessment instead of a compatriot Expert;

  • in the case of assessing objective indicators (where the assessment group consists of three Experts), the assessment of the compatriot Expert is excluded from the decision on the awarded point;

  • in the case of assessing objective indicators (where the assessment group consists of five Experts), instead of the assessment of a compatriot Expert, the competitor is awarded an average score from the assessments of the other four Experts;

  • members of the Jury give their consent to the Experts’ assessment of the Contestants from their region.
Any of the above scenarios or additional scenarios developed by the Experts may be approved by the WSR Technical Director.

      1. Prohibition on grading in the presence of a competitor
The mark is not given in the presence of the Competitor, unless otherwise stated in the Technical Description.

      1. Daily score
The day of assessment for each criterion is indicated in the CIS. The results of the assessment assessed on any given day are entered into the CIS, approved and certified by the Chief Assessor before 12:00 the next day. The approval form for CIS must be received by 8:00 pm that day. The approved results must be received by CIS specialists before 23:00 on the last day of the competition part of the Championship.

All individual statements of Experts must be signed by all members of the assessment team.


      1. Checking and submitting assessment sheets
Scores and/or grades are transferred from handwritten score sheets to the CIS as the assessment process progresses.

Once grades and/or points have been submitted to all mark sheets for any day (or all grades/scores for the entire competition for specialties for which there are no specific assessment days), the record of the grades awarded in the CIS is blocked.

Once the marking record is locked in CIS, all marking sheets, including the Final Marking Sheet, for a particular day are printed and put into a “Competency Assessment Package”. Only the Chief Expert, the Expert with special powers responsible for entering assessments into the CIS, and the CIS Administrator have access to this Package.

The Chief Expert will provide their participants' handwritten scorecards for review by the Compatriot Experts for comparison with the handwritten scorecards. Experts can discuss any questions they may have with the Chief Expert, the group that evaluated the competitor and the Expert responsible for entering grades into the CIS. If inconsistencies between handwritten data and electronic data are detected, the Expert responsible for entering grades into the CIS must make appropriate corrections to the electronic forms.

If an incorrect assessment or error is found in the handwritten form, each Expert from the assessment team for this aspect must certify the form with a signature next to the correction made (each correction must be certified by all experts of the assessment group), thereby indicating their agreement with the correction. Once changes have been made to the handwritten form, the CIS Marking Assessor must enter the correct marks into the electronic form.

Once all corrections have been made, Comparison Assessors must re-check the handwritten and printed assessment forms from the CIS and sign them only if the forms are completely consistent.

The chief expert signs the final score sheet containing the results for all competitors and submits it to the CIS office. The chief expert is obliged to ensure the confidentiality of information on the results obtained until the end of the Award Ceremony. No one has the right to demand that the Chief Expert disclose information about any of the competitors. After the completion of the Award Ceremony, the Chief Expert must communicate the results of the contestants personally to each contestant and his Expert.

At the end of this procedure, no further or new objections to the approved assessments will be accepted.


      1. Completing scoring
Evaluation of competition items and entry of points into the CIS must be completed by 22:00 on the last day of the Championship.

      1. End of the Championship
The Jury is not relieved of its assessment responsibilities until the Organizing Committee of the Championship has submitted the Competency Assessment Package and other assessment material to CIS specialists, and has received signed confirmation from them that the required tasks have been completed.

15.5. Publication of results.

15.5.1. Participating organizations are presented with a series of results with comparisons of “by average medal points,” “by average points earned,” “by total medal points,” “by total points earned,” and “alphabetically by overall medal points and by overall the number of points scored. Participating organizations are also provided with official results for each competency, indicating all competitors, their scores, medals and badges received; these results are posted on the WSR RCC website - Name of the Subject of the Russian Federation Website address.
16.MEDALS AND AWARDS
16.1. Gold, silver and bronze medals.

16.1.1. Gold, silver and bronze medals are awarded to participants who showed the first, second and third results, respectively, in all competitive competencies.

16.2. Division of medals. If the difference between the competitors is no more than 2 points on a 500-point scale, the medals are divided between them as described below. However, options based on the recommendation of the RCC, which approves the results of the competition, are acceptable.

The division of medals usually occurs as follows:

16.2.1. Gold. Two (2) gold medals, no silver medals, one (1) bronze medal.

Three (3) or more gold medals, no silver medals. In addition, one or more bronze medals when the difference between the last gold medal winners and the next competitor(s) is more than 2 points.

16.2.2. Silver. One (1) gold medal, two (2) or more silver medals. In addition, one or more bronze medals when the difference between the last gold medal winners and the next competitor(s) is more than 2 points.

16.2.3. Bronze. One (1) gold medal, one (1) silver medal, two or more bronze medals.

16.3. Medal for Professionalism.

Competitors who receive 500 points or more but do not receive a medal are awarded the Medal of Professionalism.

16.4. Certificate of Participation. Any participant who does not receive a medal or special award will receive a WSR-Competition Certificate Name of the Subject of the Russian Federation.
17. QUESTION RESOLUTION (including dispute resolution)
17.1. Resolving issues.

17.1.1. In all cases of questions that require clarification, disputes, conflicts, etc., you must first try to resolve the issue with the involvement of the Chief Competence Expert; all decisions must be documented in a Protocol, with the signatures of all Experts.

17.1.2. The resolution of a controversial issue is put to a vote by the Chief Expert and is adopted by a simple majority of votes of Experts (50% + 1 vote). Quorum is achieved when at least 80% of Experts accredited at the site of this competence participate in voting.

The decision made is documented in the Protocol, indicating in it the reasons and circumstances that necessitated the application of punishment (if applied). The protocol must be drawn up and submitted to the RCC immediately after the decision is made.

In relation to this case, the RCC may order an additional investigation into the causes and circumstances. In this case, written and oral explanations may be requested from all Experts of this competency, including the Chief Expert, and, if necessary, from competitors whose work was affected by the violation in question.
17.1.3. If the issue is raised by a competitor, the relevant Expert will handle the procedure.

17.1.4. If the issue cannot be resolved or a resolution cannot be adopted within the scope of its competence, then it is referred to the RCC for consideration on the day the controversial case arises.

17.1.5. All disputes are registered (together with resolutions) and submitted to the RCC.

17.2. Dispute resolution. The RCC deals with dispute resolution in cases where the parties believe that there has been a violation of the Code of Ethics (Appendix 7 to these Regulations). The RCC is obliged to make a decision in any case. This decision is final.

Annex 1

(Application form for participation in the Championship)

Appendix 2

(List of Experts)




Full name of the Expert

Competence

VET

Coordinates

Block width px

Copy this code and paste it onto your website

Slide captions:

Training program “Standards for conducting the WorldSkills Russia Demonstration Exam” Form of training: full-time/webinar Number of hours: 8 Introduction 1. Experience of participating in WSR championships 2. Who was trained according to WSR standards? Learning Objectives:

Introduction to WorldSkills standards for organizing a Demonstration exam

Worldskills movement

WorldSkills is an international non-profit Movement whose goal is to increase the prestige of blue-collar professions and develop vocational education by harmonizing best practices and professional standards throughout the world through the organization and conduct of professional skills competitions, both in each of the 76 member countries of the WSI Movement, and in the world at large.

Today, this is a world-famous and largest competition, in which both young skilled workers, university and college students under the age of 22, and well-known professionals, specialists, industrial training masters and mentors take part -

as experts assessing the implementation of competition tasks.

Video from the 2015 World Championships: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FesYYO7uwc4&app=desktop

Union "Agency for the Development of Professional Communities and Workforce "WorldSkills Russia"

The official representative of the Russian Federation in WorldSkills International and the operator of professional skills competitions according to WorldSkills standards in our country is the Union “Agency for the Development of Professional Communities and Workforce “WorldSkills Russia”, established by the Government of the Russian Federation jointly with the Agency for Strategic Initiatives.

The powers of the founders of the union on behalf of the Russian Federation are exercised by

Ministry of Education and Science of Russia and Ministry of Labor of Russia.

WorldSkills truly provides opportunities for: Experts to master new teaching methods and technologies, to participate in the formation of professional standards; The state should measure and compare the level of skills of specialists and students participating in championships according to WorldSkills standards throughout the country. Employers should select personnel for themselves at the stage of students receiving vocational education. Educational institutions – updating of material resources. Students can study modern technologies and best global practices, participate in regional, district, national and international championships, and receive job offers from employers. Demonstration exam according to WorldSkills standards

PURPOSE

History of the international movement WorldSkills International:

  • Appearance
  • Development
  • Transformation
  • Current state
  • Trends and development prospects in Russia and the World
  • Industry championships, Hi-Tech
  • Junior Skills
  • Future Skills
History of the international movement WorldSkills International History of the international movement WorldSkills International 1947, Spain - the birth of the Movement for professional training and competitions, which later became WorldSkills International

José Antonio Elola Olaso

History of the international movement WorldSkills International 1950 - the first international championship in blue-collar professions Spain-Portugal (12 participants) History of the international movement WorldSkills International 1953 - Great Britain, Switzerland, France, Germany, Morocco joined the Movement History of the international movement WorldSkills International 1958 - for the first time competitions were held outside of Spain - in Brussels (Belgium) as part of the World Exhibition History of the international movement WorldSkills International 1970 - for the first time the championship was held on the other side of the world - in Japan, Tokyo History of the international movement WorldSkills International

  • 1983 - The movement was transformed into the International Organization for professional training and competitions - International Vocational Training Organization (IVTO)
  • In the early 2000s, IVTO was renamed WorldSkills International (WSI)
  • WorldSkills International now includes 76 countries, including Russia

Russia joined WSI

Russia took part in the WorldSkills International Championship for the first time (Leipzig, Germany)

Russia held the first National Final “according to WorldSkills International standards”

  • Russia took part in the European Championship according to Worldskills standards for the first time
  • Conducting the first championship according to Worldskills standards for specialists from industrial enterprises and corporations in Russia in cross-cutting Hi-Tech professions
  • The origins of Juniorskills
History of the emergence and development of the WorldSkills movement in Russia

Participation of Russia in the World Championship in Brazil (Sao Paulo) in 30 competencies. The Russian team brought 6 “medallions for professionalism”.

Russia received the right to host the next international championship WorldSkills International in 2019 in Kazan.

The country's leadership has set the task of implementing WSR standards when conducting end-to-end assessments of the level of training of students in the vocational education system and specialists from industrial companies with state participation.

The Russian team took 1st place in the team competition based on points at the Euroskills European Championship in Gothenburg, gaining 15,882 points in all competencies, receiving 2 gold (Electronics, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Systems), 2 silver (Graphic Design, Mobile Robotics), 1 bronze medal (System Administration), as well as 11 medallions for professionalism.

Order of the President of the Russian Federation

Following the meeting with the National Team for Professional Excellence, held on September 1, 2015, President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin signed a list of instructions Pr-1921 dated September 22, 2015, including:

  • Preparation and holding of the World Championship of Professional Skills according to WorldSkills standards 2019 in Kazan
  • Holding by state corporations of industry championships in professional skills according to WorldSkills standards, as well as their organization of annual training of teams to participate in international competitions according to WorldSkills standards
  • Creation of infrastructure for mass training of highly qualified workers and engineers according to WorldSkills standards
  • Implementation of measures aimed at popularizing and increasing the prestige of blue-collar and engineering professions

Video Kazan 2019

WorldSkills in Russia today: 2015 – the “Second Russian Championship in cross-cutting blue-collar professions Hi-Tech 2015” was held. Within the framework of this championship, the competencies of the future FutureSkills were presented for the first time. 61 regions out of 85 joined the “WorldSkills Russia” movement. The movement received a new name: “Young Professionals (WorldSkills Russia)” Schedule of National Finals “Young Professionals” (WorldSkills Russia) 2016 Moscow region, Krasnogorsk (“Crocus-Expo”). 2017 Krasnodar 2018 Kazan Upcoming international championships according to WorldSkills standards October 2017 – WSC (UAE, Abu Dhabi) 2018 – EuroSkills (Hungary, Budapest) 2019 – WSC (Russia, Kazan) Demonstration exam according to WorldSkills Russia standards Demo exam

Demonstration exam is a form of assessing the conformity of the level of knowledge, abilities, skills of students and graduates mastering training programs for qualified workers, employees, mid-level specialists, allowing them to conduct professional activities in a certain field and (or) perform work in a specific profession or specialty in accordance with standards WorldSkills Russia.

Plans for conducting a Demonstration exam according to WorldSkills Russia standards in 2017.

Regulations:

    • List of instructions for the implementation of the Address of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly of December 4, 2014 dated December 5, 2014 No. Pr-2821,
    • Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 349 March 3, 2015 “A set of measures aimed at improving the system of secondary vocational education”;
    • Order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated April 22, 2016 N 750-“On approval of the plan for the preparation and holding of the world championship in professional skills “Worldskills” in Kazan in 2019;

  • Passport of the priority project "Education" in the direction
  • "Training highly qualified specialists and workers taking into account modern standards and advanced technologies ("Workforce for advanced technologies").

  • List of instructions of the President of the Russian Federation following the meeting with members
  • Russian national team in professional skills from December 29, 2016 Pr-2582

Prospects for the implementation of the Demonstration Exam in the State Civil Aviation Inspectorate

  • comparison of results with the global level of competencies
  • assessment of the quality of personnel training;
  • determination of growth points of secondary vocational education (education programs, mathematical and technical base, teaching staff)
  • A graduate may receive a job offer based on the exam results
  • The company can select employees from among graduates

Electronic passport of a professional in a personal profile in the eSim system

  • Publicity and openness of the exam (live broadcasts, spectators)

Subjects of the Russian Federation that applied elements of the WorldSkills Russia methodology in the State Final Certification (SFA) in 2016

The total number of students who took part in the state assessment exercise using the WorldSkills Russia methodology

Tyumen region

57 competencies

  • Vladimir region
  • Moscow city
  • (best experience in conducting State Examination)

  • Kirov region
  • Kurgan region
  • Novosibirsk region
  • Orenburg region
  • Perm region
  • Republic of Bashkortostan
  • The Republic of Buryatia
  • (best experience in conducting State Examination)

  • Republic of North Ossetia (Alania)
  • Republic of Tatarstan
  • (best experience in conducting State Examination)

  • Sverdlovsk region

68 educational organizations

Organization and conduct of a demonstration exam by a certified expert

Comparison of demo exam results and 2015 WSC World Championship results

Testing and measuring materials based on the Final tasks

IV National Championship “Young Professionals” (WSR) for competencies included in the TOP - 50 professions and specialties, including all modules

Organization and conduct of a demonstration exam by a certified expert of the WorldSkills Russia Union

Using the CIS grading system

Compliance of venues with WSR requirements

Basic requirements for conducting a demonstration exam according to WorldSkills standards

It is inadmissible to evaluate the completion of tasks by experts representing the same educational organization as the examinee.

It is not allowed to conduct the exam in groups formed from different study groups. The number of DE participants must be at least 70% of the number of students in the study group.

Demonstration exam according to WorldSkills Russia standards

In 2017 in pilot format:

26 subjects of the Russian Federation

62 competencies

150 educational organizations

6,000 graduates

Championships according to WorldSkills Russia standards - general information Key terms for the Championship and demonstration exam: - Code of Ethics
  • Championship Regulations / “Methodology for organizing and conducting a demonstration exam according to WorldSkills Russia standards”
  • - Technical description of the competency
  • Test project, 30% changes (not applicable to DE)
  • Infrastructure sheet
  • - “Toolbox” (For DE can be provided by the organizers) - Development plan for the competition site - Site operation plan (SMP) - Evaluation criteria - CIS, 100 point and 500 point scale of results
Functions in the demo exam - Chief Expert (championship sites)
  • Site technical expert
  • Expert
  • At championships there are also such functions as:
  • Deputy Chief Expert (Championship Sites)
  • Site technical expert
  • Expert with special powers
  • President (Chairman) of the jury
  • - Team leader (team leader)
Basic terms of WSR: - Demonstration exam - Regional championship - Qualifying round for the National Championship - Russian Final - Industry championships - Russian Final for enterprises - HiTech - End-to-end monitoring system - SCS - MCC Structure of WorldSkills Russia Championships

Russian National Final “Young Professionals” (WorldSkills Russia)”

Qualifying rounds

Demo exams

Regional Championships

Russian final for HiTech industries

Qualifying rounds

Championships at enterprises

Structure of the Russian expert community:

National expert

Chief regional expert

Software system experts

Independent experts

Chief expert of the enterprise

Enterprise experts

WorldSkills Russia Competency Structure:

  • “Numbered” competencies – competencies included in the list of the World Championship;
  • Competencies included in the list of European Championships;
  • RU-Competencies.
End-to-end monitoring system for the results of participants’ performances at Championships according to WSR standards. Objectives of the End-to-End Monitoring System:
  • Assessment of the quality of training of students of secondary vocational education in Russia;
  • Assessment of the qualification level of employees of Russian enterprises;
  • Recruitment of personnel for Russian enterprises;
  • Selection of the best candidates for the National Team.
Basic principles of the End-to-End Monitoring System: Use of a single competitive task for all Russian championships, developed on the basis of the task from the last World Championship. The test task has a level of difficulty that is very high for a professional (it is practically impossible to complete the test task entirely behind the allotted period of time and absolutely no mistakes); The competition task consists of modules, each of which is designed to test specific skills and has its own weight in points. Use of uniform criteria for all championships, developed on the basis of criteria from the last World Championship. Identical conditions for completing competition tasks (equipment, consumables, time frames, etc.). At the end of the championship, the results of each participant are included in the end-to-end monitoring system. The system allows you to compare the performance results of participants in different championships. Technically, comparisons are possible not only by final scores, but also by modules. Summing up “History” and “General Information”
  • When did the Worldskills movement begin?
  • In what year did Russia take part in the international WS championship for the first time?
  • Team leader
  • Technical expert
  • President's Jury
Summing up “History” and “General Information”
  • 1947
  • What features are not included in the demo exam:
  • Team leader
  • Technical expert
  • President's Jury
  • 4. What challenges does the end-to-end monitoring system face?

    Assessment of the quality of training of students of secondary vocational education in Russia;

    Assessment of the qualification level of employees of Russian enterprises;

    Recruitment of personnel for Russian enterprises;

    Selection of the best candidates for the National Team.

    5. What are the functions of the chief regional expert?

    Development of competence in the region

    Translation of WorldSkills knowledge and standards in the region

Preparation for WorldSkills Championships and Demonstration Exams The championship preparation plan contains the stages of preparation, starting from the moment the first action to implement the preparation is carried out. Plan for conducting the competition (SMP - Skill Management Plan) SMP contains a daily work plan for the sites, which contains all the activities taking place on the championship site for each day separately. The SMP is posted in printed form at each site. “C” - Coding of championship days: C1 – “C” – competition, “1” – first day of competition; C-3 – third day BEFORE the competition; C+1 – the first day AFTER the competition. The SMP used for the Demo Exam may vary in functionality days. In particular, the functionality of days C-2 and C-1 can be combined in day C-1. It is important that the principle of providing ALL participants with the opportunity to familiarize themselves with workplaces and equipment during the time specified in the regulatory documents (for example, in the document “Methodology for organizing and conducting a demonstration exam according to WorldSkills Russia standards”) is followed. Preparation of the Demonstration Exam

Events

In 3 months

Key experts for the site are identified

An expert group is being formed

in 2 months

Sending to the CPDE a list of students and graduates passing a demonstration exam according to WorldSkills Russia standards.

CPDE organizes the registration of all registered participants in the eSim system, and also ensures that all participants fill out personal profiles no later than two months before the start of the exam. Informs registered participants about the timing and procedure for conducting a demonstration exam

After specifying the number of participants in the competency exam

The chief expert develops and approves a scheme for arranging and staffing workplaces at each site. Responsibility for providing sites with optimal means and the necessary infrastructure for conducting a demonstration exam for each competency in accordance with the technical descriptions and infrastructure sheets lies with the CPDE

Preparation of the Demonstration Exam

    2. What is Toolbox?

Testing on the topic “Preparation of WorldSkills Championships”
  • What is a Skill Management Plan (SMP)?
  • Site work plan (competencies)

    2. What is Toolbox?

  • Tool box
  • List of instruments that a participant can bring with them
  • 3. When does the expert perform a site check before the demonstration exam?

    4. What should be indicated in the Infrastructure List?

    List of all necessary equipment, tools, supplies, office equipment and supplies needed to operate the site

Competitive documentation package for championships according to WorldSkills standards The main regulatory documents of championships according to WorldSkills standards are 4 documents: - Code of Ethics; - Championship regulations / Methodology for organizing a demonstration exam - Technical description of the competency; - Competition task for the championship. If it is impossible to make a decision based on the specified documents, the decision is made collectively and documented in the Protocol Supporting documents: - Development plan for the competition site - Infrastructure sheet - Evaluation criteria Code of Ethics establishes ethical standards of conduct for persons involved in championships according to WSR standards. This document is the same for all WorldSkills championships. The Championship Regulations / Methodology for conducting a demonstration exam establishes the basic organizational requirements for holding a specific championship according to WorldSkills standards. The Regulations/Methodology prescribe the rules common to all competencies. The technical description of a competency is a document that defines the framework of knowledge and skills that a competitor of a specific competency must have. The technical description of the competency is based on advanced technologies that are relevant and accessible to a wide range of professionals at the time of its development and updating. Technical description of competencies for Russian championships updated once a year at the National Championships. Certified experts take part in the updating. Purpose updating The technical description is to include new relevant technologies that have become widespread within this competence, as well as expanding the scope of competence by including knowledge and skills used by specialists in related professions (for example, including knowledge and skills in diagnosing electronic systems (competency "Automotive Technologies" ) into the “Body Repair Master” competency, which was previously limited only to working with metal (straightening, welding, etc.). A site development plan is a document that graphically and schematically depicts all the necessary infrastructure of the site using symbols: from chairs. and tables, to the location of machines and other equipment, all necessary connections (electricity, water, compressed air, ventilation, lighting, trash cans, etc. Examples of Construction Plans Infrastructure sheet - a list of all necessary equipment, tools, consumables, office equipment and supplies necessary for the operation of the site. All positions indicated in the Infralist are provided by the championship organizers. “Toolbox” is a list of tools and consumables that the participant must (or has the right) to bring with them. The list of “toolboxes” is indicated in the Technical Description of the competency. A competition task is a document (or a set of documents) that describes in detail the tasks facing the competitors on the site within the framework of the Championship. The competition task must clearly convey to the competitors the essence and rules for performing all actions. The test task has a very high level of difficulty even for a professional Test task for National Championship is developed by a group of certified experts under the guidance of a National Expert. As a rule, the Test Project from the last World Championship is taken as the basis for “numbered” competencies. Development begins and ends within the time limits specified in the Technical Description. The Test Project consists of modules. The number of modules can be from 3 to 9. Each module has its own weight in points. Engineering CAD design The total time to complete 100% of the Test Project must be between 15 and 22 hours. Drawing up the Test Project and its publication occurs in accordance with the Technical Description of the competency The Test Project may be made public in advance (from 1 to 4 months) The Test Project usually details in detail all the procedures that the Competitor must perform. If necessary, the KZ should be supplied with drawings, drawings and diagrams. The Test Project may include STOP points, which indicate that the Competitor must stop the Test Project and call the Experts for evaluation. If a competitor is forced to stop completing a task for the duration of the assessment, this time does not count towards the total time allotted for completing the task. Recommended Test task for Regional Championships is developed by the National Expert together with certified experts. It is usually based on the Test Project from the last National Championship. Recommended Test Project - Single and developed for ALL regional championships. Each Test Project is accompanied by a Marking Scheme specially created for it (Assessment Criteria). The Criteria are also divided into modules in accordance with the Test Project structure. If a shortened Test Project is agreed upon for a regional championship, the Region must take only the Criteria corresponding to the Test Project modules taken. The national expert may refuse to approve a shortened Test Project if the reduction of the task is due to the opinion of regional experts about the “inflated complexity of the task for their students.” For the Pilot Project of the Demonstration Exam, a package of competitive documentation agreed with the VSR Union is used. Modification of documentation by experts on DE is PROHIBITED! The Test Project Evaluation Scheme is a set of Criteria for assessing the quality of the Test Project and the skill of the Competitors. The evaluation criteria are a set of aspects to measure the skills and qualifications of the competitors. The criteria are drawn up in such a way as to most accurately and correctly measure the competitor’s level of proficiency in the skills and knowledge necessary for a top-class professional. The elementary position of the criteria is aspect. The more aspects there are and the lower the weight of each aspect, the more accurately the level of completion of the test task can be assessed. However, too many aspects can delay the evaluation process. Therefore, their number and weight are regulated. The number of aspects should range from 50 to 300 positions in total for all modules. Optimally – from 75 to 250. The weight of one aspect should not exceed 2 points. The total weight of aspects for all modules of the Test Project cannot exceed 100 points. Aspects can be objective or subjective. Objective aspects are measurable. They are assessed by a group of 3 experts. Objective aspects can be essentially binary or discrete. Binary aspects involve a “yes” or “no” assessment. That is, either the aspect is fulfilled or it is not. For example: - aspect weight = 1.5 points - aspect name “All bolts are tightened with the required force” - data “10 bolts, force 10N/m” Discrete aspects have partial execution conditions. For example: - aspect weight = 2 points - aspect name “All bolts are tightened with the required force” - data “10 bolts, force 10N/m)”. - condition “Subtract 1 point for each bolt not tightened with the required force.” Subjective aspects - not measurable (for example, “beautiful”, “aesthetically pleasing”, “tasty”, “professional”, etc.). They are assessed by a group of 5 experts. For scoring, cards with ratings from 1 to 10 are used. In general, a scale from 1 to 10 means: 10 = masterpiece, extremely rare result 9 = excellent, quality above industrial level 8 = very good, quality at the highest industrial level 7 = good, quality at standard industrial level. 6 = satisfactory, quality below industry standards 5 = quality below industry standards, but the participant has good skill and sufficient knowledge to perform the procedures being assessed. 4 = have good theoretical knowledge of performing procedures, but lack sufficient skills. 3 = no skills, knowledge at an average level. 2 = no skills, low level knowledge. 1 = no knowledge or skills. Judgment* aspects: not measured, but: - assessed by a group of 3 experts; - have four rating options: 0, 1, 2, 3; - assessed using a subjective assessment procedure; - the difference between estimates should not be more than 1. Judgment* ratings: 0 – no experience, no knowledge or no attempt. 1 – there is knowledge and understanding of the specifics of the profession. The quality is acceptable for use. 2 – knowledge and experience, quality at a high professional level. 3 – a masterpiece, an extremely rare result. *consult your National Expert. Rules for judging at WorldSkills Championships General Rules Any decisions are made in accordance with the Championship Regulations, the Code of Ethics, the Technical Description of the Profession, and the Competition Project.

Decision Rules

Decisions not regulated by the above documents are made collectively by the expert community and formalized in the Protocol.

Decision Rules

No one, including the Chief Expert, has the right to make decisions individually, if this is not regulated by the championship documentation and such decisions may affect the assessment of participants.

Decision Rules

WorldSkills core values ​​are Fairness and Relevance. WorldSkills standards serve these values ​​and should not conflict with them.

WorldSkills Core Values

1. What documents are regulating at the WorldSkills championships? 2. Can technologies not specified in the Technical Description be included in the Test Project? 3. How are decisions made that are not regulated by these documents? 4. Which document has a section about Toolbox?

Document testing

1. What documents are regulating at the WorldSkills championships? - code of ethics - championship regulations - technical description - competition task 2. Can technologies not specified in the Technical Description be included in the Test Project? No 3. How are decisions made that are not regulated by these documents? collegially by the expert community and formalized by the Protocol. 4. Which document has a section about Toolbox? Technical description

Document testing

Rules for refereeing on the court Distribution of referee roles at the Championship:- conducted by the Chief Expert on day C-2; - the results are documented in the Protocol Roles of experts on site:- Chief expert; - Technical expert of the site; - Responsible for entering grades into CIS; - President (Chairman) of the jury (does not apply to DE); - Deputy Chief Expert (not applicable to DE); - Judicial jury to evaluate Objective (3 experts) and Judicial (3 experts) / Subjective (5 experts) criteria (experts who have been trained in the program for DE experts are appointed to perform this function). Chief site expert The chief expert of the site organizes the work of experts on the site, distributes judicial roles, monitors compliance with the rules by experts, participants and other persons who have access to the site. The main expert can be a certified expert or an expert who has a document from the HRV certifying his right and competence to organize championships within his competence. The main experts of the championships are appointed by the Championship Organizing Committee. The actions of the Chief Expert are controlled by the Chairman (President) of the jury according to their competence. Site technical expert The technical expert of the site does not participate in the judging. He must take the most neutral position in relation to all participants and has no right to be present during the judging procedure. Any exceptions to this rule must be specified in the Championship Regulations and in any case cannot violate the Code of Ethics and the basic principles of Relevance and Fairness. Responsible for entering grades into CIS In DE this is a certified expert. Enters assessments into CIS. Controls the restriction of access to reporting documents (assessment statements, computer with open CIS). Judges Jury Experts of the judging jury can be experts who have been trained by the Chief Expert on the Rules of Evaluation before the jury is composed of experts, championship and competent in the profession. Judging accredited on the site (experts of competitors, independent experts). Compatible Experts and Independent Experts Independent experts: Experts who do not have this competency of their participant on the site and have no interest in the victory of a certain candidate. As a rule, these are experts from existing enterprises/commercial organizations with high qualifications and experience in the real sector of the economy. Expert compatriot: An expert accredited at the championship to accompany his participant. Comppatriot – “compatriot”, i.e. from the same organization as the participant and, thus, interested in his victory. Compatriot experts are not allowed onto the DE site. An expert in the evaluation group (jury expert) from the same educational organization as the participant being assessed is a compatriot expert in relation to the participant from his educational organization and, with regard to judging and communication, the rules for a compatriot expert are applied to him. Rules for communication between a compatriot Expert and his participant A compatriot expert does not have the right to communicate privately or have any contact with his participant during the competition. Contact is permitted only in the presence of another expert, during lunch, and during specially scheduled time for participants to communicate with their experts according to the SMP. Rules for the use of recording devices on sites

The possibility and rules for the use of any recording devices, including handwritten ones, may be regulated by the Special Site Rules (Skill Specific Rules)

Rules for evaluation by groups of judges (jury): - the assessment is carried out by a group of experts appointed during the procedure for distributing judicial roles; - assessment can be made only after the participant has completed the module/task or upon reaching the “STOP” point; - all experts of the group must be present during the assessment; - when evaluating a compatriot participant, the compatriot expert must be replaced by another expert if there is no decision on his admission to judging his participant; - all experts of this group endorse the given grades with their signatures; - The Participant has no right to be present during the evaluation unless specified in the Test Project or Technical Description. Rules for evaluating Subjective criteria: - subjective assessment is carried out before the assessment procedure of objective criteria, so that the objective assessment does not influence the opinion of the judges; - the assessment is carried out by a group of 5 (five) experts; - the assessment is made by rating each of the five experts on a 10-point scale. For this, cards with numbers from 1 to 10 are used; - the difference in scores should not be more than 4 points. In case of a difference of more than 4 points, the Chief Expert must give additional explanations to the group on the rules for judging subjective criteria and the group must re-vote; - the assigned grades are entered into the CIS subjective evaluation forms; - when entering scores into the CIS system, the system removes the lowest and highest score, from the remaining 3 scores it calculates the arithmetic mean, divides it by 10 and multiplies it by the weight of the criterion. Rules for evaluating Objective criteria:- the assessment is carried out by a group of 3 (three) experts after completing the assessment procedure of the Subjective Criteria; - the assessment must consist of an unambiguous determination of the fulfillment or non-fulfillment / partial fulfillment of each objective aspect in accordance with the information in the assessment form; - objective criteria do not allow for ambiguity in their interpretation, i.e. The exact parameters and rules for awarding points for compliance with them must always be indicated. Who can be on the competition site? Only accredited persons, as well as persons whose presence has been approved by the Chief Expert, may be present at the competition site. No one has the right to contact the participants while they are performing the competition task, with the exception of the main expert. Working conditions for participants No one has the right to touch, examine, photograph (etc.) the participant’s work, as well as his tools and equipment, unless this is provided for by the competition procedures and is not stated in the competition documentation. If a participant's tool (a tool from the participant's toolbox) fails, either the participant himself or his compatriot expert can repair the tool. Other experts, including technical experts, are prohibited from repairing the participant's tool. The tools provided by the organizers (specified in the IL) are repaired by a technical expert. Working conditions for participants The participant cannot be present during the evaluation procedure unless this is provided for in the competition procedures and is not described in the competition task! What regulatory documents allow you to make a decision in this case? Dear……..! I took part in the regional stage of WorldSkills Russia in the “……..” competency. I would like to say right away that no one familiarized me with the existing regulations of the competition and did not announce the rules prohibiting me from bringing my own measuring instruments to the site. The situation is that on the second day of the test, I used my stopwatch instead of the one provided and a notepad to record test results throughout the day; Both my expert and the rest of the people on the site saw this and didn’t say a word, everyone was happy with everything, until at the end of the day, when I had already completed everything, one of the experts found out about it and filed a petition for my disqualification. As a result, they decided to deduct 2 points from me, as a result of which I did not take 3rd place, which I was in. I consider this situation unfair, since my stopwatch did not give me any advantages, and no one announced the rules prohibiting its use; and my own expert didn't say a word to me for three modules. I ask you to assist in reviewing the decision taken on this situation. Sincerely, ... Testing on the topic "Refereeing"
  • Who distributes the refereeing roles at the championship?
  • Chief expert of the championship

    2. When assessing subjective aspects, what difference between assessments is acceptable?

    3. How many experts should be on the objective assessment team?

    4. Who can act as the main examiner for the demonstration exam?

    Experts who have completed training organized by the Union

    "WorldSkills Russia" and having certificates of the right to evaluate the completion of tasks of the demonstration exam

    Experts who have completed training organized by the WorldSkills Russia Union and have certificates of the right to conduct a corporate or regional championship

Exam for knowledge of HRV standards Online testing for end-to-end monitoring of the level of acquired knowledge. Contact for technical testing issues: [email protected]